Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2404.07026

Optimal Communication Complexity of Chained Index

Abstract

We study the CHAIN communication problem introduced by Cormode et al. [ICALP 2019]. It is a generalization of the well-studied INDEX problem. For $k\geq 1$, in CHAIN$_{n,k}$, there are $k$ instances of INDEX, all with the same answer. They are shared between $k+1$ players as follows. Player 1 has the first string $X^1 \in \{0,1\}^n$, player 2 has the first index $σ^1 \in [n]$ and the second string $X^2 \in \{0,1\}^n$, player 3 has the second index $σ^2 \in [n]$ along with the third string $X^3 \in \{0,1\}^n$, and so on. Player $k+1$ has the last index $σ^k \in [n]$. The communication is one way from each player to the next, starting from player 1 to player 2, then from player 2 to player 3 and so on. Player $k+1$, after receiving the message from player $k$, has to output a single bit which is the answer to all $k$ instances of INDEX. It was proved that the CHAIN$_{n,k}$ problem requires $Ω(n/k^2)$ communication by Cormode et al., and they used it to prove streaming lower bounds for approximation of maximum independent sets. Subsequently, it was used by Feldman et al. [STOC 2020] to prove lower bounds for streaming submodular maximization. However, these works do not get optimal bounds on the communication complexity of CHAIN$_{n,k}$, and in fact, it was conjectured by Cormode et al. that $Ω(n)$ bits are necessary, for any $k$. As our main result, we prove the optimal lower bound of $Ω(n)$ for CHAIN$_{n,k}$. This settles the open conjecture of Cormode et al. in the affirmative. The key technique is to use information theoretic tools to analyze protocols over the Jensen-Shannon divergence measure, as opposed to total variation distance. As a corollary, we get an improved lower bound for approximation of maximum independent set in vertex arrival streams through a reduction from CHAIN directly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Janani Sundaresan. 2024-05-30. Optimal Communication Complexity of Chained Index. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC