Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2404.09930

Perfect matchings and spanning trees: squarishness, bijections and independence

Seok Hyun Byun·Mihai Ciucu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A number which is either the square of an integer or two times the square of an integer is called squarish. There are two main results in the literature on graphs whose number of perfect matchings is squarish: one due to Jockusch (for planar graphs invariant under rotation by 90 degrees) and the other due to the second author (concerning planar graphs with two perpendicular symmetry axes). We present in this paper a new such class, consisting of certain planar graphs that are only required to have one symmetry axis. Our proof relies on a natural bijection between the set of perfect matchings of two closely related (but not isomorphic!) families of graphs, which is interesting in its own right. The rephrasing of this bijection in terms of spanning trees turns out to be the most natural way to present this result. The basic move in the construction of the above bijection (which we call gliding) can also be used to extend Temperley's classical bijection between spanning trees of a planar graph and perfect matchings of a closely related graph. We present this, and as an application we answer an open question posed by Corteel, Huang and Krattenthaler. We also discuss another dimer bijection (used in the proof of the second author's result mentioned above), and deduce from a refinement of it new results for spanning trees. These include a finitary version of an independence result for the uniform spanning tree on $\Z^2$ due to Johansson, a counterpart of it, and a bijective proof of an independence result on edge inclusions in the uniform spanning tree on $\Z^2$ due to Lyons.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Seok Hyun Byun, Mihai Ciucu. 2024-04-15. Perfect matchings and spanning trees: squarishness, bijections and independence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09930

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO↗