Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2404.10806

The theoretical basis of reservoir pressure in arteries

Abstract

The separation of measured arterial pressure into a reservoir pressure and an excess pressure was introduced nearly 20 years ago as an heuristic hypothesis. We demonstrate that a two-time asymptotic analysis of the 1-D conservation equations in each artery coupled with the separation of the smaller arteries into inviscid and resistance arteries, based on their resistance coefficients, results, for the first time, in a formal derivation of the reservoir pressure. The key to the two-time analysis is the existence of a fast time associated with the propagation of waves through the arteries and a slow time associated with the convective velocity of the blood. The ratio between these two time scales is given by the Mach number; the ratio of a characteristic convective velocity to a characteristic wave speed. If the Mach number is small, a formal asymptotic analysis can be carried out which is accurate to the order of the square of the Mach number. The slow-time conservation equations involve a resistance coefficient that models the effect of viscosity on the convective velocity. On the basis of this resistance coefficient, we separate the arteries into the larger inviscid arteries where the coefficient is negligible and the smaller resistance arteries where it it is not negligible. The slow time pressure in the inviscid arteries is shown to be spatially uniform but varying in time. We define this pressure as the reservoir pressure. Dynamic analysis using mass conservation in the inviscid arteries shows that the reservoir pressure accounts for the storage of potential energy by the distension of the elastic inviscid arteries during early systole and its release during late systole and diastole. This analysis thus provides a formal derivation of the reservoir pressure and its physical meaning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kim H. Parker, Alun D. Hughes. 2024-04-16. The theoretical basis of reservoir pressure in arteries. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10806

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Lightning-fast adaptive immune receptor similarity search by symmetric deletion lookup

An individual's adaptive immune receptor (AIR) repertoire records immune history due to the receptors' antigen specificity. Reading this record requires computational approaches for inferring receptor function from sequence, as the diversity of possible receptor-antigen pairs vastly outstrips experimental knowledge. Identification of AIRs with similar sequence and thus putatively similar function is a common performance bottleneck in these approaches. Here, we benchmark the runtime scaling of five algorithmic approaches to radius-based search for Levenshtein neighbors. We show that a symmetric deletion lookup approach, originally proposed for spell-checking, is particularly scalable. We introduce SymScan and XTNeighbor, optimized CPU and GPU software implementing a parallelized variant of the algorithm. For one million input sequences, these tools identify all sequence pairs that differ by one or two edits in seconds, orders of magnitude faster than existing approaches. We demonstrate how symmetric deletion lookup can be integrated as a pre-filtering step in T cell receptor metaclone discovery and B cell receptor lineage identification. Our contribution is poised to greatly accelerate existing analysis pipelines and enable processing of immunosequencing data at scale.

q-bio.QM

Implication of modelling choices on connectivity estimation: A comparative analysis

Landscape connectivity is an important field with important conservation implications. Connectivity modelling is a useful tool to inform and guide landscape planning. However, it involves assumptions and methodological decisions which ultimately impact connectivity outcomes. In order to understand the implications of modelling choices on final connectivity estimations, we compare two landscape characterisation approaches - expert knowledge and species distribution models - and three movements models - least-cost paths, circuit theory and an individual-based movement simulator. The implementation of the models and the construction of the analyses scope highlighted conceptual and methodological differences that made the comparison difficult. Landscape characterisation appears as the principal factor determining connectivity outcomes. Therefore, the confrontation between expert knowledge and species distribution models is critical to leverage points of convergence and complementarity between these two approaches. Conceptual differences between movement models are reported on connectivity map and habitat patch contribution estimations. In the want of data and protocol design specifically to validate connectivity models, approaches that integrate stochastic and behavioural processes, bring a more realistic perspective to connectivity estimation.

q-bio.QM

Triplication: an important component of the modern scientific method

A scientific-study protocol (defined) is designed to deliver results from which inductive inference is allowed. In the nineteenth century, triplication was introduced into the plant sciences and Fisher's p<0.05 rule (1925) incorporated into triple-result protocols designed to counter random/systematic errors which contribute to real-world variability. The aims of the present study were to: (1) classify replication protocols; (2) assess their prevalence in plant-science studies (published during one twenty-first-century year; for defined variable construct); (3) explore triplication rationale. Methods: a plant-sciences protocol-prevalence report was produced; experimental/associational-study proportions analyzed; and real-world-data proxies used to show confidence-interval-width patterns with increasing replicate number. Results: 25% plant-science studies analyzed showed triplication, including 11% triple-result protocols (including greater replicate numbers: 48%;17%, respectively). Theoretical considerations indicated that even if systematic errors predominate, (previously-known) square-root rules sometimes apply, contributing to triplication importance (exemplified by real-world-data proxies). Conclusions: The defined protocols, with minor modifications, should provide the means for assessment of most sciences. Triplication was extensively applied in studies analysed and there are strong methodological reasons why triplication, rather than duplication/quadruplication, is the appropriate standard: triple-result protocols: (a) effectively reduce false positives to acceptable levels; (b) give qualitatively-different information (shape) from duplication; (c) have a large efficiency advantage (concerning confidence-interval widths) over quadruplication. The application of batch replication is not, primarily, a statistical problem and cannot effectively be replaced by simulation.

q-bio.QM