Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2404.11705

A Comprehensive Study for Multi-Criteria Comparison of EV, ICEV, and HEV

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are increasingly becoming popular as a viable means of transportation for the future. The use of EVs may help to provide better climatic conditions in urban areas with a pocket friendly cost for transportation to the consumers throughout its life. EVs enact as a boon to the society by providing zero tailpipe emissions, better comfort, low lifecycle cost and higher connectivity. The article aims to provide scientific information through the literature across various aspects of EVs in their lifetime and thus, assist the scholarly community and various organisations to understand the impact of EVs. In this study we have gathered information from the articles published in SCOPUS database and through grey literature with the focus of information post 2009. After identification of various factors while purchasing the vehicle, the total cost of ownership (TCO) for vehicles is calculated and their average TCO for each segment is considered for the study. Following that, we investigate the ranking of EVs, vehicles powered by internal combustion engines (ICEVs), and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) in a variety of price segments by employing a combination of two different multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques. Initially, best-worst method (BWM) is used to determine the weights of each of the identified criterion, which is thereafter, used in conjunction with the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to compute the rank of the available alternatives using BWM. The ranking obtained clearly indicates that EVs should be first purchase choice of the consumers, followed by HEVs and ICEVs respectively. Thus, the results help us conclude that EVs enact as a sustainable means of transport for the future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tushar Gahlaut, Gourav Dwivedi. 2024-06-24. A Comprehensive Study for Multi-Criteria Comparison of EV, ICEV, and HEV. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11705

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN