Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2404.14860

Rethinking Processing Distortions: Disentangling the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on Speech Recognition Performance

Tsubasa Ochiai·Kazuma Iwamoto·Marc Delcroix·Rintaro Ikeshita·Hiroshi Sato·Shoko Araki·Shigeru Katagiri
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

It is challenging to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance in noisy conditions with a single-channel speech enhancement (SE) front-end. This is generally attributed to the processing distortions caused by the nonlinear processing of single-channel SE front-ends. However, the causes of such degraded ASR performance have not been fully investigated. How to design single-channel SE front-ends in a way that significantly improves ASR performance remains an open research question. In this study, we investigate a signal-level numerical metric that can explain the cause of degradation in ASR performance. To this end, we propose a novel analysis scheme based on the orthogonal projection-based decomposition of SE errors. This scheme manually modifies the ratio of the decomposed interference, noise, and artifact errors, and it enables us to directly evaluate the impact of each error type on ASR performance. Our analysis reveals the particularly detrimental effect of artifact errors on ASR performance compared to the other types of errors. This provides us with a more principled definition of processing distortions that cause the ASR performance degradation. Then, we study two practical approaches for reducing the impact of artifact errors. First, we prove that the simple observation adding (OA) post-processing (i.e., interpolating the enhanced and observed signals) can monotonically improve the signal-to-artifact ratio. Second, we propose a novel training objective, called artifact-boosted signal-to-distortion ratio (AB-SDR), which forces the model to estimate the enhanced signals with fewer artifact errors. Through experiments, we confirm that both the OA and AB-SDR approaches are effective in decreasing artifact errors caused by single-channel SE front-ends, allowing them to significantly improve ASR performance.

Explore related subjects

eess.AScs.SD

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tsubasa Ochiai, Kazuma Iwamoto, Marc Delcroix, Rintaro Ikeshita, Hiroshi Sato, Shoko Araki, Shigeru Katagiri. 2024-04-23. Rethinking Processing Distortions: Disentangling the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on Speech Recognition Performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14860

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Revisiting Lexicon Evaluation in Unsupervised Word Discovery

Building a lexicon from discovered word-like units is a central goal in zero-resource speech processing. But do our evaluations provide a trustworthy indication of lexicon quality? A common metric, normalized edit distance, averages the phoneme edit distances between discovered units in each cluster. We show that this metric has an inherent bias toward the quality of large clusters, inhibiting fair evaluation. Moreover, it ignores how well true classes are distributed across clusters. Based on established theory in clustering literature, we propose two metrics that address these shortcomings: a modified metric that weighs cluster size when assessing within-cluster consistency, and an inverse metric that assesses how true words are spread across clusters. Through experiments on synthetic and real-world lexicons, we demonstrate that combined, these metrics are: (1) more closely correlated with how similar a lexicon is to the ground-truth distribution, and (2) more robust to biases that skew lexicon evaluations.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

AURA: Uncertainty-Routed Activation Editing for Acoustic Grounding in Speech Foundation Models

Attention encoder-decoder (AED) Speech Foundation Models achieve strong ASR performance but can generate acoustically unsupported text when inputs contain no speech, weak acoustic evidence, or unreliable transcription. We propose AURA: Activation-editing with Uncertainty-Routed Adaptation, an ultra-efficient representation-editing method that freezes the pretrained model and applies sparse scale-and-shift edits to decoder cross-attention heads. AURA dynamically routes edits using cross-attention uncertainty features that capture over-concentration, diffuse attention, and abrupt frame shifts. We evaluate AURA on four datasets spanning non-speech hallucination and speech grounding stressors, including imperfect-label child speech, imperfect-label adult speech, and disfluent speech. On non-speech audio, AURA reduces hallucination rate from 89.18% to 1.94% without prior hallucination-head identification. On imperfect-label corpora, AURA approaches LoRA WER while using roughly 500x fewer trainable parameters. Sensitivity analysis and qualitative cross-attention examples are consistent with AURA's uncertainty-routed editing behavior, supporting dynamic activation editing as a practical path for grounding AED speech models.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

The design of an optomechanical microphone using a photonic waveguide interferometer

We present an optomechanical microphone based on a diaphragm-integrated photonic waveguide Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Acoustic pressure deforms the MEMS diaphragm, inducing strain in the sensing waveguide and changing its optical path length. We analytically evaluate the optical and mechanical transduction mechanisms and key figures of merit, including signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range, acoustic overload pressure, and minimum detectable pressure. Two design cases are considered: a MEMS microphone and a measurement microphone. The results indicate competitive performance but no substantial overall advantage over state-of-the-art microphones in conventional applications. The architecture may nevertheless offer advantages for high-temperature and other harsh-environment sensing applications.

eess.AS↗