Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2404.18906

On Clustering Induced Voronoi Diagrams

Abstract

In this paper, we study a generalization of the classical Voronoi diagram, called clustering induced Voronoi diagram (CIVD). Different from the traditional model, CIVD takes as its sites the power set $U$ of an input set $P$ of objects. For each subset $C$ of $P$, CIVD uses an influence function $F(C,q)$ to measure the total (or joint) influence of all objects in $C$ on an arbitrary point $q$ in the space $\mathbb{R}^d$, and determines the influence-based Voronoi cell in $\mathbb{R}^d$ for $C$. This generalized model offers a number of new features (e.g., simultaneous clustering and space partition) to Voronoi diagram which are useful in various new applications. We investigate the general conditions for the influence function which ensure the existence of a small-size (e.g., nearly linear) approximate CIVD for a set $P$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ for some fixed $d$. To construct CIVD, we first present a standalone new technique, called approximate influence (AI) decomposition, for the general CIVD problem. With only $O(n\log n)$ time, the AI decomposition partitions the space $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ into a nearly linear number of cells so that all points in each cell receive their approximate maximum influence from the same (possibly unknown) site (i.e., a subset of $P$). Based on this technique, we develop assignment algorithms to determine a proper site for each cell in the decomposition and form various $(1-ε)$-approximate CIVDs for some small fixed $ε>0$. Particularly, we consider two representative CIVD problems, vector CIVD and density-based CIVD, and show that both of them admit fast assignment algorithms; consequently, their $(1-ε)$-approximate CIVDs can be built in $O(n \log^{\max\{3,d+1\}}n)$ and $O(n \log^{2} n)$ time, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Danny Z. Chen, Ziyun Huang, Yangwei Liu, Jinhui Xu. 2024-04-29. On Clustering Induced Voronoi Diagrams. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18906

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A constant-factor approximation of the Gromov-Hausdorff distance in the plane

We give the first polynomial-time constant-factor approximation of the Gromov-Hausdorff distance d_GH between finite point sets in the Euclidean plane; in fixed Euclidean dimension such an approximation was previously known only on the line (Majhi, Vitter and Wenk, 2024). Global alignment cannot succeed: the classical dimension drop defeats alignment by isometries, a multiplicity gap defeats alignment by bijections, and a reflection barrier defeats sorting under any single global reflection pattern. The algorithm is therefore local. Guessing the images of one diameter pair pins every point's longitudinal coordinate to within O(d_GH). Heights are read in windows whose height spread is at most a fixed multiple of their length, where a chain argument makes every compatible match local in the plane. One reflection sign per window is then chosen by 2-SAT; at the right frame and guess, any solution yields a correspondence of distortion O(d_GH). For the bijective relative of d_GH, half the least additive distortion over bijections, the same scheme reduces the planar problem to a matching question that we leave open.

cs.CG

Witness Set in Weak Visibility Polygons is Polynomial-Time Solvable

In the classical Art Gallery Problem (AGP), guards are placed in a polygon so that together they see every point. The Witness Set Problem (WSP), introduced by Amit, Mitchell, and Packer, is a natural dual to the AGP. In this paper, we study the WSP in weak visibility polygons (WVPs), the simple polygons in which every point is seen from some point of one fixed edge. A witness set is a set of points whose visibility regions are pairwise disjoint, so that no single guard sees two of them. A maximum witness set, therefore, lower-bounds the guard number. Exact polynomial-time algorithms for the WSP are known only for monotone mountains, a proper subclass of WVPs. We give the first exact polynomial-time algorithms for the WSP in WVPs, in two settings. In the Discrete Witness Set Problem (DiscWSP), the witnesses come from a given set of $m$ points, and we find a maximum witness subset in $O(n + m \log(n+m))$ time on an $n$-vertex polygon. The algorithm rests on a structural fact: the visibility intersection graph of a WVP, in which two points are adjacent if their visibility regions intersect, is a trapezoid graph, that is, an intersection graph of trapezoids between two parallel lines. Moreover, the class of these graphs properly contains the interval graphs and the permutation graphs, which may be of independent interest in graph theory. We also prove an $Ω(n \log n)$ lower bound in the algebraic decision-tree model for instances with $m = Θ(n)$, so our algorithm for DiscWSP is optimum. In the Continuous Witness Set Problem (ContWSP), a witness may be any point of the polygon, and we give an exact algorithm running in $O(n \log n + ρ^{2}(n + ρ^{2}))$ time, where $ρ$ is the number of reflex vertices.

cs.CG

Bichromatic Line-Centers for Point Pairs

We study the \emph{bichromatic line-center problem} for $n$ pairs of points in the plane. A feasible solution assigns one point from each pair to the red set $R$ and the other to the blue set $B$. The goal is to minimize $\max\{w^\circ(R),\,w^\circ(B)\}$, where $w^\circ(X)$ denotes the minimum width of a strip enclosing $X$; the midlines of the corresponding optimal strips define the line-centers of $R$ and $B$. We consider several variants induced by orientational constraints on line-centers and provide efficient algorithms for each. For one line-center, which consists of computing a minimum-width strip that contains at least one point from each pair, we give an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm. For two line-centers, we obtain an $O(n)$-time algorithm when both are horizontal, and $Θ(n\log n)$-time algorithms when the two centers are parallel or when both orientations are prescribed. When exactly one orientation is prescribed, we give an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm. Finally, for the unrestricted case, we present an $O(n^3\log n)$-time algorithm.

cs.CG