Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2405.03245

How improving performance may imply losing consistency in event-triggered consensus

David Meister·Duarte J. Antunes·Frank Allgöwer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Event-triggered control is often argued to lower the average triggering rate compared to time-triggered control while still achieving a desired control goal, e.g., the same performance level. However, this property, often called consistency, cannot be taken for granted and can be hard to analyze in many settings. In particular, the performance properties of decentralized event-triggered control schemes with respect to time-triggered control remain mostly unexplored. Therefore, in this paper, we examine these performance properties for a consensus problem considering single-integrator agent dynamics, a level-triggering rule, and a complete communication graph. We consider the long-term average quadratic deviation from consensus as a performance measure. For this setting, we show that enriching the information the local controllers use improves the performance of the consensus algorithm but renders a previously consistent event-triggered control scheme inconsistent. In addition, we do so while deploying optimal control inputs which we derive for both information cases and triggering schemes. With this insight, we can furthermore explain the relationship between two seemingly contrasting consistency results from the literature.

Explore related subjects

eess.SYcs.SY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Meister, Duarte J. Antunes, Frank Allgöwer. 2025-11-21. How improving performance may imply losing consistency in event-triggered consensus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112768

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Co-Investment with Payoff-Sharing Mechanism for Cooperative Decision-Making in Network Design Games

Network-based systems are inherently interconnected, with the design and performance of subnetworks being interdependent. However, the decisions of self-interested operators may lead to suboptimal outcomes for users and the overall system. This paper explores cooperative mechanisms that can simultaneously benefit both operators and users. We address this challenge using a game-theoretical framework that integrates both non-cooperative and cooperative game theory. In the non-cooperative stage, we propose a network design game in which subnetwork decision-makers strategically design local infrastructures. In the cooperative stage, co-investment with payoff-sharing mechanism is developed to enlarge collective benefits and fairly distribute them. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we conduct case studies on the Sioux Falls network and real-world public transport networks in Zurich and Winterthur, Switzerland. Our evaluation considers impacts on environmental sustainability, social welfare, and economic efficiency. The proposed framework provides a foundation for improving interdependent networked systems by enabling strategic cooperation among self-interested operators.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2026

Generalizable Optimal Control with Transformers: One Policy Across Diverse Systems

Classical optimal control designs a separate controller for each plant. Even for the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), every new model must be identified and its Riccati equation re-solved. We ask whether a single learned policy can instead serve an entire family of systems, and we show that one transformer can. We train the policy to imitate optimal LQR state feedback across a collection of heterogeneous Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output (MIMO) Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) systems that differ in their state and input dimensions and in their cost objectives. A shared representation lets the same parameters control every member of the family. It combines system-wise standardization, zero-padding and masking across dimensions, and an explicit encoding of the cost matrices. At run time, the policy maps a short window of recent states and the specified cost to a control action. It uses no plant matrices and identifies the dynamics implicitly from the state history. We evaluate on $28$ simulated systems over $9{,}675$ closed-loop rollouts, and no unstable rollout was observed in any of them. On the systems seen during training, it attains a median relative sub-optimality of $0.022\%$, even under parameter perturbations of up to $\pm10\%$. It transfers to unseen systems with lightweight fine-tuning, reaching a median sub-optimality of $0.19\%$. These results support transformers as generalizable near-optimal controllers for structured families of linear systems.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2026

Two-Timescale Asymptotic Simulations of Hybrid Inclusions with Applications to Stochastic Hybrid Optimization

Convergence properties of model-free two-timescale asymptotic simulations of singularly perturbed hybrid inclusions are developed. A hybrid inclusion combines constrained differential and difference inclusions to capture continuous (flow) and discrete (jump) dynamics, respectively. Sufficient conditions are established under which sequences of iterates and step sizes constitute a two-timescale asymptotic simulation of such a system, with limiting behavior characterized via weakly invariant and internally chain-transitive sets of an associated boundary layer and reduced system. To illustrate the applicability of these results, conditions are given under which a two-timescale stochastic approximation of a hybrid optimization algorithm asymptotically recovers the behavior of its deterministic counterpart.

eess.SY↗