Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2405.08253

Thompson Sampling for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Decision Processes

Daniel Adelman·Cagla Keceli·Alba V. Olivares-Nadal
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper develops a viable notion of learning for sampling-based algorithms that applies in broader settings than previously considered. More specifically, we model a discounted infinite-horizon MDPs with Borel state and action spaces, whose rewards and transitions depend on an unknown parameter. To analyze adaptive learning algorithms based on sampling we introduce a general canonical probability space in this setting. Since standard definitions of regret are inadequate for policy evaluation in this setting, we propose new metrics that arise from decomposing the standard expected regret in discounted infinite-horizon MDPs into three terms: (i) the expected finite-time regret, (ii) the expected state regret, and (iii) the expected residual regret. Component (i) translates into the traditional concept of expected regret over a finite horizon. Term (ii) reflects how much future performance is compromised at a given time because earlier decisions have led the system to a less favorable state than under an optimal policy. Finally, metric (iii) measures regret with respect to the optimal reward from the current period onward, disregarding the irreversible consequences of past decisions. We further disaggregate this term by introducing the probabilistic residual regret, a finer, sample-path version of (iii) that captures the remaining loss in future performance from the current period onward, conditional on the observed history. Its expectation coincides with (iii). We then focus on Thompson sampling (TS); under assumptions that extend those used in prior work on finite state and action spaces to the Borel setting, we show that component (iii) for TS converges to zero exponentially fast. We further show that, under mild conditions ensuring the existence of the relevant limits, its probabilistic counterpart converges to zero almost surely and TS achieves complete learning.

Explore related subjects

stat.MLcs.LGmath.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Adelman, Cagla Keceli, Alba V. Olivares-Nadal. 2026-04-08. Thompson Sampling for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Decision Processes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08253

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Attack-Resistant Uniform Fairness for Linear and Smooth Contextual Bandits

Modern digital platforms use contextual bandits to allocate valuable exposure and opportunities among competing participants. Fair treatment is therefore an important concern, yet reward maximization alone does not ensure that preferential allocation reflects participants' merits. We develop algorithms for linear and smooth contextual bandits under uniform merit-based fairness, requiring the reward ordering to justify preferential allocation across all contexts and rounds, and study how these guarantees are affected by adversarial reward corruption. Our algorithms achieve \((1-\widetilde O(1/T))\)-fairness, with regret that is minimax optimal among fair policies for linear rewards and nearly minimax optimal for smooth rewards. In the linear setting, matching lower bounds identify the price of fairness exactly: minimax regret increases from \(\log T\) to \(\log^2 T\). For smooth rewards, the cost of fairness is at most polylogarithmic. We further establish a separation between regret and fairness robustness: an \(\widetilde O(1)\) corruption budget can cause substantial fairness violations without worsening the regret order. We therefore develop robust algorithms that adapt sampling, estimation, and fairness certification to corruption, which preserve uniform fairness and achieve minimax-optimal and nearly optimal regrets for linear and smooth rewards, respectively. Numerical and semi-synthetic experiments illustrate these findings.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

The Cost of Privacy: Rates of Convergence for Parameter Estimation with Differential Privacy

We study the minimax cost of $(\varepsilon,δ)$-differential privacy for mean estimation and Gaussian linear regression in low and high dimensions. For low-dimensional mean estimation, a resampling reduction to fingerprinting yields the privacy contribution $d^2\log(1/δ)/(n^2\varepsilon^2)$ in the stated polynomial-$δ$ regime. For low-dimensional regression, a tracing argument gives the contribution $d^2/(n^2\varepsilon^2)$ under an explicit approximate-DP remainder condition. For sparse mean estimation and sparse regression, a constant-weight packing and a private Fano lemma produce an effective privacy entropy of order $\min\{s\log(ed/s),[\log((e^\varepsilon-1)/δ)]_+\}$ for $δ>0$, up to universal constants and a fixed threshold; for pure DP it is $s\log(ed/s)$. Thus, when $δ$ is polynomially smaller than $\varepsilon$, the pure-DP dependence is retained up to polylogarithmic factors whenever the effective dimension is polylogarithmic in $n$, including regimes with $\varepsilon=o(1)$. Coordinatewise-clipping estimators for means and split-sample noisy-gradient estimators for regression attain the lower bounds up to explicit logarithmic factors. Simulations and data examples illustrate related implementations.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Robust Mixture Models for Algorithmic Fairness Under Latent Heterogeneity

Machine learning models optimized for average performance can perform poorly on vulnerable subpopulations. Existing approaches often rely on groups specified in advance, yet fairness-relevant subgroup structure may be latent, intersectional, and driven by complex interactions among continuous and discrete attributes. We introduce \textbf{ROME} (\textbf{\underline{RO}}bust \textbf{\underline{M}}ixture \textbf{\underline{E}}nsemble), a framework that learns latent group structure while optimizing worst-group predictive performance. ROME connects latent-variable modeling with distributionally robust optimization (DRO) through two complementary approaches: an Expectation-Maximization formulation with robust aggregation for linear models and a neural Mixture-of-Experts formulation for nonlinear settings. Across simulations and three real-world regression datasets, ROME improves worst-group performance while maintaining competitive overall accuracy, including in comparisons with established group-aware and group-label-free robust learning methods. ROME provides a flexible approach to robust prediction when fairness-relevant attributes are available for subgroup discovery but their direct use in group-specific outcome models is restricted.

stat.ML↗