Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2406.08195

On the equivalence of quasirandomness and exchangeable representations independent from lower-order variables

Abstract

It is often convenient to represent a process for randomly generating a graph as a graphon. (More precisely, these give \emph{vertex exchangeable} processes -- those processes in which each vertex is treated the same way.) Other structures can be treated by generalizations like hypergraphons, permutatons, and, for a very general class, theons. These representations are not unique: different representations can lead to the same probability distribution on graphs. This naturally leads to questions (going back at least to Hoover's proof of the Aldous--Hoover Theorem on the existence of such representations) that ask when quasirandomness properties on the distribution guarantee the existence of particularly simple representations. We extend the usual theon representation by adding an additional datum of a random permutation to each tuple, which we call a $\ast$-representation. We show that if a process satisfies the \emph{unique coupling} property UCouple[$\ell$], which says roughly that all $\ell$-tuples of vertices ``look the same'', then the process is $\ast$-$\ell$-independent: there is a $\ast$-representation that does not make use of any random information about $\ell$-tuples (including tuples of length $<\ell$). Simple examples show that the use of $\ast$-representations is necessary. This resolves a question of Coregliano and Razborov, since it easily follows that UCouple[l] implies Independence[\ell'] (the existence of an $\ell'$-independent ordinary representation) for $\ell'<\ell$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Leonardo N. Coregliano, Henry P. Towsner. 2024-06-12. On the equivalence of quasirandomness and exchangeable representations independent from lower-order variables. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08195

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO