Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2407.00887

Portfolio optimisation: bridging the gap between theory and practice

Abstract

Portfolio optimisation is essential in quantitative investing, but its implementation faces several practical difficulties. One particular challenge is converting optimal portfolio weights into real-life trades in the presence of realistic features, such as transaction costs and integral lots. This is especially important in automated trading, where the entire process happens without human intervention. Several works in literature have extended portfolio optimisation models to account for these features. In this paper, we highlight and illustrate difficulties faced when employing the existing literature in a practical setting, such as computational intractability, numerical imprecision and modelling trade-offs. We then propose a two-stage framework as an alternative approach to address this issue. Its goal is to optimise portfolio weights in the first stage and to generate realistic trades in the second. Through extensive computational experiments, we show that our approach not only mitigates the difficulties discussed above but also can be successfully employed in a realistic scenario. By splitting the problem in two, we are able to incorporate new features without adding too much complexity to any single model. With this in mind we model two novel features that are critical to many investment strategies: first, we integrate two classes of assets, futures contracts and equities, into a single framework, with an example illustrating how this can help portfolio managers in enhancing investment strategies. Second, we account for borrowing costs in short positions, which have so far been neglected in literature but which significantly impact profits in long/short strategies. Even with these new features, our two-stage approach still effectively converts optimal portfolios into actionable trades.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cristiano Arbex Valle. 2024-09-30. Portfolio optimisation: bridging the gap between theory and practice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00887

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM

Separated Signal Libraries: Packing, Saturation, and Joint Spectral Limits

We study libraries of cross-sectional signals: at each date, a forecast vector over $d$ assets intended to predict the next period's cross-sectional return. Demeaned and unit-normalized, a signal is a point on a sphere and its $T$-date history a point on a product of $T$ spheres. A pairwise correlation cap on histories is a minimum angular separation on that product, so growing a library under such a cap is a packing problem. If a large library is not too pairwise correlated and is equally weighted, does the equally weighted sum (EWS) tend to a known principal-component quantity as it grows? We answer this under explicit assumptions on how the library is filled. Separation alone guarantees nothing: it fixes no limiting distribution; a saturated library covers the sphere yet can carry a biased count; and near-maximum packing on a fixed domain forces uniform volume, which on the unrestricted sphere gives zero mean and no distinguished principal component (PC1). Alignment depends on the admission rule and candidate distribution. Under the uniform product-volume benchmark, screening on positive average information coefficient (IC) yields a nonzero, target-aligned mean but an isotropic second moment, whereas a positive IC margin $β$ makat every finite $T$, with athree-level spectrum whose leading eigenvalue tends to $β^2$ while residual levels decay as $1/T$; margins of order $T^{-1/2}$ keep a positive admission rate but a vanishing eigengA finite residual-spectrum criteS-PC1 alignment.Gilbert-Varshamov codes show separation permits both outcomes: exponentially large positive-IC libraries exist whose EWS is PC1, and others whose EWS is orthogonal to PC1. $\log J=o(T)$ suffices for uniform estimation among $J$ candidates from $T$ iid dates. Derived results are proved and checked numerically; no market data are used.

q-fin.PM