Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2407.02959

Competing for the most profitable tour: The orienteering interdiction game

Abstract

The orienteering problem is a well-studied and fundamental problem in transportation science. In the problem, we are given a graph with prizes on the nodes and lengths on the edges, together with a budget on the overall tour length. The goal is to find a tour that respects the length budget and maximizes the collected prizes. In this work, we introduce the orienteering interdiction game, in which a competitor (the leader) tries to minimize the total prize that the follower can collect within a feasible tour. To this end, the leader interdicts some of the nodes so that the follower cannot collect their prizes. The resulting interdiction game is formulated as a bilevel optimization problem, and a single-level reformulation is obtained based on interdiction cuts. A branch-and-cut algorithm with several enhancements, including the use of a solution pool, a cut pool and a heuristic method for the follower's problem, is proposed. In addition to this exact approach, a genetic algorithm is developed to obtain high-quality solutions in a short computing time. In a computational study based on instances from the literature for the orienteering problem, the usefulness of the proposed algorithmic components is assessed, and the branch-and-cut and genetic algorithms are compared in terms of solution time and quality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eduardo Álvarez-Miranda, Markus Sinnl, Kübra Tanınmış. 2024-07-03. Competing for the most profitable tour: The orienteering interdiction game. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02959

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Operational Impact of Registry size, Cycle length, and Blood Type Distribution in Multi-Registry Kidney Exchange Programs

Kidney exchange programs address donor recipient incompatibility by exchanging donors between incompatible pairs, but single center KEPs often suffer from limited donor pools, which reduce matching efficiency. Multi registry kidney exchange programs offer a promising solution but face challenges, including heterogeneous constraints across registries, cycle-length bounds, and data-sharing limitations. This study uses simulation to compare mKEP allocation against individual registry operation, contrasting unconstrained pooling with two safeguarded mechanisms: a cumulative individual-rationality guarantee and a Shapley value based fair-share mechanism. We examine how registry size, blood-type distribution, cycle-length bounds, and dropout probability affect the size and distribution of achievable gain. Our central finding is that the benefit of joining an mKEP is systematically uneven: under blood group composition asymmetry, the easier-to-match registry gains less than its partner even under both safeguarded mechanisms, and a larger registry gains less than a smaller one when pooled. A registry combining a larger arrival rate with an easier-to-match pool may see its gain under either safeguarded mechanism fall too small to be practically significant, while registries with a higher dropout rate see a larger benefit from pooling. This unevenness concentrates in O-type recipients: an easier-to-match registry sees fewer O-type transplants within itself under pooling, though O-type transplant rates rise system-wide. Tighter cycle-length bounds increase, rather than diminish, the relative transplant-volume benefit of pooling, while match quality is only modestly affected by any factor examined. These results highlight the importance of pairing multi-registry collaboration with a carefully designed, equitable benefit-sharing mechanism to keep participation attractive for all registries involved.

math.OC

A polynomial approximation scheme for nonlinear model reduction by moment matching

We propose a procedure for the numerical approximation of invariance equations arising in the moment matching technique associated with reduced-order modeling of high-dimensional dynamical systems. The Galerkin residual method is employed to find an approximate solution to the invariance equation using a Newton iteration on the coefficients of a monomial basis expansion of the solution. These solutions to the invariance equations can then be used to construct reduced-order models. We assess the ability of the method to solve the invariance PDE system as well as to achieve moment matching and recover the steady-state behaviour of nonlinear systems with state dimension of order 1000 driven by linear and nonlinear signal generators.

math.OC

Computationally Efficient Density-Driven Optimal Control via Analytical KKT Reduction and Contractive MPC

Efficient coordination for collective spatial distribution is a fundamental challenge in multi-agent systems. Prior research on Density-Driven Optimal Control (D2OC) established a framework to match agent trajectories to a desired spatial distribution. However, implementing this as a predictive controller requires solving a large-scale Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) system, whose computational complexity grows cubically with the prediction horizon. To resolve this, we propose an analytical structural reduction that transforms the T-horizon KKT system into a condensed quadratic program (QP). This formulation achieves O(T) linear scalability, significantly reducing the online computational burden compared to conventional O(T^3) approaches. Furthermore, to ensure rigorous convergence in dynamic environments, we incorporate a contractive Lyapunov constraint and prove the Input-to-State Stability (ISS) of the closed-loop system against reference propagation drift. Numerical simulations verify that the proposed method facilitates rapid density coverage with substantial computational speed-up, enabling long-horizon predictive control for large-scale multi-agent swarms.

math.OC