Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.06223

PubTrend: General Overview of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal cancer diagnosis from 2010-2022

Mary Adewunmi·Reem Abdel-Salam
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent cancers in the world. Due to numerous scholarly papers and broad enquiries about specific use cases for artificial intelligence (AI) in colorectal cancer, researchers find it challenging to explore relevant papers on the current knowledge, comprehensive knowledge, and past methodologies in the literature review. This review extracts recent AI technology advances for diagnosing colorectal cancer from January 2010 to March 2022. PubTrends was used to identify and automate the intellectual structure and comparable papers on the use of AI in colorectal cancer diagnosis using the most cited papers, keywords, and similar papers. Papers with quantitative results were represented with a tabular summary, and other paper contributions were in a sentence summary. Twenty-four (24) out of the forty-nine (49) top-cited papers were quantitative results, with one (1) outlier about lung cancer comprehensive screening. The most frequently used words were: "polyps," "detected", "image," and "colonoscopy." In addition, 83 per cent of the terms frequently used shortly before 2022 were image, polyps, detected, colonoscopy, and learning. In addition, 16 per cent are preparation, variant, classification, sample, and surgery. The review showcases 49 of the 50 most cited papers, their notable contributions, objectives, specific AI methods, results, conclusions, and further recommendations. These papers highlight the limitations of colonoscopy for therapeutic use. The review concluded that despite the enormous benefits of using artificial intelligence, from improving diagnosis, the medical AI programmer still needs to be actively involved in the diagnosis team for effective results in CRC diagnosis.

Explore related subjects

eess.IV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mary Adewunmi, Reem Abdel-Salam. 2024-07-06. PubTrend: General Overview of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal cancer diagnosis from 2010-2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06223

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

LaminoDiff: Generative Computed Laminography via Near-Isotropic Spectral Supervision and Anisotropic Geometry

Computed Laminography (CL) is widely used for nondestructive inspection of extended planar objects, but its restricted angular coverage produces an anisotropic point spread function, missing-cone spectral incompleteness, and severe aliasing with interlayer leakage. This paper presents LaminoDiff, a physics-constrained diffusion framework for CL reconstruction. During training, a CT-derived near-isotropic supervision target is reconstructed from full-angle Computed Tomography (CT) projections physically degraded to match CL detector noise and focal-spot blur while retaining full angular coverage; it is withheld from inference. At inference, the reverse process uses only the CL observation. An Anisotropic Representation (AR) constructs depth-aware channels from three adjacent slices: a neighbor average, a center-neighbor residual, and the retained current slice, followed by directional in-plane feature extraction. Experiments on simulated and real multilayer printed circuit board data, including ball grid array and high-frequency stub samples, show that LaminoDiff improves artifact suppression, edge preservation, and depth stratification over analytic Feldkamp--Davis--Kress and representative learning-based baselines.

eess.IV↗
arXiv2026

IViT: A Novel Interpretable Visual Transformer for Skin Disease Detection

The clinical diagnosis of skin diseases is susceptible to interference from inter-class similarity of skin lesions, and over-reliance on clinicians'experience easily leads to subjective bias. Although existing deep learning aided diagnosis methods achieve competitive accuracy, they suffer from the black-box opacity of Vision Transformer (ViT) and poor adaptability to medical few-shot scenarios. Moreover, mainstream explainable algorithms generally face the bottleneck of significant accuracy degradation when improving interpretability. This paper proposes an interpretable ViT (IViT) constrained by Quadratic Programming (QP). The introduced pre-trained transfer learning adapts to few-shot feature extraction. A discrete QP feature selection framework is constructed to screen generic and discriminative features consistent with clinical diagnostic logic. A multi-objective loss function is designed to reduce feature redundancy and optimize activation distribution while preserving classification performance. Experimental results on six standard skin disease datasets show that IViT achieves an accuracy of 93.80%, only 0.21% lower than the baseline, with feature redundancy reduced by 29.5%. Its core activation regions are consistent with clinically concerned lesion areas. The proposed model balances accuracy and interpretability, providing a reliable solution for the clinical deployment of few-shot intelligent skin disease diagnosis.

eess.IV↗
arXiv2026

Automated Distinction of Intimal and Medial Intracranial Arterial Calcification from CT Head

Intracranial arterial calcifications (IACs) are a common finding on clinical non-contrast enhanced head CT scans and are associated with neurovascular disease. Calcifications can occur in the intimal or medial layer of the arterial wall, subtypes that differ in aetiology and may have distinct clinical relevance. These subtypes can be visually distinguished by radiologists based on the shape of the calcifications. We investigate three automated approaches for subtype classification of IAC from head CT-derived segmentation masks: (1) an automated adaptation of the established radiological visual score, (2) a sphericity-based method, and (3) a method based on shape embeddings extracted by a medical shape foundation model. All approaches use the same lightweight classification pipeline on top of the features they compute and are evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. The three methods achieved comparable performance, with the embedding-based approach yielding the best overall results with a weighted F1 (mean $\pm$ SD) of up to 71.5 $\pm$ 3.7 for a single artery and 59.8 $\pm$ 1.7 for the joint artery classification. Performance was largely preserved when using automated instead of manual IAC segmentation masks, and we found the difference in weighted F1 not significant. Our results show that fully automated IAC subtype quantification from head CT is feasible and remains robust to the use of manual and automated IAC segmentation masks. Code at https://github.com/bjin96/iac-subtyping.

eess.IV↗