Variational Bayes for Mixture of Gaussian Structural Equation Models

Khue-Dung Dang; Luca Maestrini; Francis K. C. Hui

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.08140

Variational Bayes for Mixture of Gaussian Structural Equation Models

Khue-Dung Dang·Luca Maestrini·Francis K. C. Hui

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Structural equation models (SEMs) are commonly used to study the structural relationship between observed variables and latent constructs. Recently, Bayesian fitting procedures for SEMs have received more attention thanks to their potential to facilitate the adoption of more flexible model structures, and variational approximations have been shown to provide fast and accurate inference for Bayesian analysis of SEMs. However, the application of variational approximations is currently limited to very simple, elemental SEMs. We develop mean-field variational Bayes algorithms for two SEM formulations for data that present non-Gaussian features such as skewness and multimodality. The proposed models exploit the use of mixtures of Gaussians, include covariates for the analysis of latent traits and consider missing data. We also examine two variational information criteria for model selection that are straightforward to compute in our variational inference framework. The performance of the MFVB algorithms and information criteria is investigated in a simulated data study and a real data application.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Khue-Dung Dang, Luca Maestrini, Francis K. C. Hui. 2024-07-11. Variational Bayes for Mixture of Gaussian Structural Equation Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08140

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Modeling cyclostationarity in time series using ASCA

Modern data analysis across diverse disciplines increasingly relies on time series. Many of these datasets exhibit cyclostationarity, where patterns approximately repeat in a regular manner, often across multiple time scales, such as daily, weekly or yearly cycles. In this context, statistical inference is essential to distinguish genuine underlying effects from random variability. While tools like Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) provide such inference, they often lack interpretability and struggle with the complexities of multivariate data. To address these limitations, we propose a unified pipeline for the exploratory analysis of cyclostationary times series using ANOVA Simultaneous Component Analysis (ASCA). ASCA is an extension of ANOVA that is able to work in both univariate and multivariate cases. Combining inference with the visualization capabilities of Principal Component Analysis (PCA), ASCA provides powerful options for interpretability. ASCA's capabilities have been well-established in the analysis of experimental data, but they remain largely unexplored for observational data like time series. Our workflow introduces an algorithmic approach to modeling time-dependent data using ASCA, enabling control over multiple cyclostationary time scales while also accounting for the specific challenges of this type of data, such as autocorrelation. Furthermore, we observed that ASCA provides a better separation of variability across factors than ANOVA in unbalanced designs due to its multivariate nature. We demonstrate the efficacy of this methodology through two real-world case studies: water temperature trends in mountain lakes in Sierra Nevada, Spain, and airborne pollen trends over 30 years recorded in the city of Granada, Spain.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Distributionally balanced sampling designs via tactical configurations

Distributionally balanced sampling designs are low-discrepancy probability designs obtained by minimizing the expected discrepancy between the auxiliary-variable distribution of a random sample and the target population distribution. Existing constructions rely on circular population sequences, which restrict the design space by forcing samples to be contiguous blocks of a sequence. We propose a new construction based on tactical configurations that removes this topological constraint. The resulting designs are fixed-size and have equal inclusion probabilities. We develop both a simple initialization valid for arbitrary population and sample sizes and a spatial initialization that yields a lower initial expected discrepancy, together with a simulated annealing algorithm for optimization within this class. In simulations and empirical examples, the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art alternatives in terms of distributional fit and balance.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Bayesian Quantile Regression for Misclassified Binary Data with an Application to Spousal Violence Reporting

Survey responses on socially undesirable behaviors, such as self-reported spousal violence, are often subject to underreporting due to social stigma, fear of retaliation, and other reporting pressures. When such data are analyzed using standard econometric models that focus on conditional means, such as probit and logit models, the resulting estimates are likely to be biased and can obscure heterogeneity in covariate effects. To address these challenges, we propose a Bayesian binary quantile regression framework that accounts for misclassification and provides quantile-specific effects for the latent true response. The framework incorporates false-negative and false-positive probabilities to capture reporting errors and employs a novel partially collapsed Gibbs sampler for estimation. We also discuss the computation of covariate effects and marginal likelihood for Bayesian model comparison. Simulation studies under various settings (prior effective sample size, misclassification rates, and prior distribution) show that accounting for misclassification improves inference across quantiles relative to models that ignore reporting errors. We apply the framework to women's self-reported spousal violence and find that underreporting of spousal violence exceeds overreporting across quantiles, while model comparisons using marginal likelihood generally favor the quantile model with misclassification and yield different conclusions about the determinants of reported violence.

stat.ME↗