Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2407.09101

Resistance, oddness and colouring defect of snarks

Abstract

Let $G$ be a bridgeless cubic graph. The \textit{resistance} of $G$, denoted $r(G)$, is the minimum number of edges which can be removed from $G$ in order to render 3-edge-colourability. The \textit{oddness} of $G$, denoted $ω(G)$, is the minimum number of odd components in a 2-factor of $G$. The \textit{colouring defect} of $G$ (or simply, the \textit{defect} of $G$), denoted $μ_3(G)$, is the minimum number of edges not contained in any set of three perfect matchings of $G$. These three parameters are regarded as measurements of uncolourability of snarks, partly because any one of these parameters equal zero if and only if $G$ is 3-edge-colourable. It is also known that $r(G) \geq ω(G)$ and that $μ_3(G) \geq \frac{3}{2}ω(G)$ \cite{fiol,jinsteffen}. We have shown that the ratio of oddness to resistance can be arbitrarily large for non-trivial snarks \cite{allie1}. It has also been shown that the ratio of the defect to oddness can be arbitrarily large for non-trivial snarks, although this result was only shown for graphs with oddness equal to 2 \cite{karabasetal}. In the same paper, the question was posed whether there exists non-trivial snarks for given resistance $r$ or given oddness $ω$, and arbitrarily large defect. In this paper, we prove a stronger result: For any positive integers $r \geq 2$, even $ω\geq r$, and $d \geq \frac{3}{2}ω$, there exists a non-trivial snark $G$ with $r(G)=r$, $ω(G)=ω$ and $μ_3(G) \geq d$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Imran Allie. 2024-07-12. Resistance, oddness and colouring defect of snarks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09101

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO↗

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO↗

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO↗