Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.09154

Simple Linear Loops: Algebraic Invariants and Applications

Rida Ait El Manssour·George Kenison·Mahsa Shirmohammadi·Anton Varonka
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The automatic generation of loop invariants is a fundamental challenge in software verification. While this task is undecidable in general, it is decidable for certain restricted classes of programs. This work focuses on invariant generation for (branching-free) loops with a single linear update. Our primary contribution is a polynomial-space algorithm that computes the strongest algebraic invariant for simple linear loops, generating all polynomial equations that hold among program variables across all reachable states. The key to achieving our complexity bounds lies in mitigating the blowup associated with variable elimination and Gröbner basis computation, as seen in prior works. Our procedure runs in polynomial time when the number of program variables is fixed. We examine various applications of our results on invariant generation, focusing on invariant verification and loop synthesis. The invariant verification problem investigates whether a polynomial ideal defining an algebraic set serves as an invariant for a given linear loop. We show that this problem is coNP-complete and lies in PSPACE when the input ideal is given in dense or sparse representations, respectively. In the context of loop synthesis, we aim to construct a loop with an infinite set of reachable states that upholds a specified algebraic property as an invariant. The strong synthesis variant of this problem requires the construction of loops for which the given property is the strongest invariant. In terms of hardness, synthesising loops over integers (or rationals) is as hard as Hilbert's Tenth problem (or its analogue over the rationals). When the constants of the output are constrained to bit-bounded rational numbers, we demonstrate that loop synthesis and its strong variant are both decidable in PSPACE, and in NP when the number of program variables is fixed.

Explore related subjects

cs.CCmath.AG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rida Ait El Manssour, George Kenison, Mahsa Shirmohammadi, Anton Varonka. 2024-11-13. Simple Linear Loops: Algebraic Invariants and Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09154

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Lettericity Is NP-Complete

The lettericity of a graph $G$ is the smallest size of a set $Σ$ such that there exist $w_1, \ldots, w_{|V(G)|} \in Σ$ and a decoder $D \subseteq Σ^2$ for which $G$ is isomorphic to the letter graph $(\{1, \ldots, |V(G)|\}, \{ij : 1 \le i < j \le |V(G)|, w_iw_j \in D\})$. It took around two decades of the study of lettericity for, in the simpler case of paths, a closed-form expression for its lettericity to be derived; this suggests that the question of whether the lettericity of an arbitrary graph can be computed in polynomial time is nontrivial. Indeed, this question has been raised repeatedly as an open problem in recent literature. We solve this problem by showing that the lettericity problem on arbitrary graphs is NP-complete (Theorem 10). We also prove that the coloring extension problem (the same problem as lettericity, with the added condition that if $f$ is the isomorphism mapping from $G$ to the letter graph, $w_{f(v)} = χ(v)$ for a given coloring $χ$ of $G$) is NP-complete (Theorem 12). We also resolve the open problem of classifying the complexity of the word extension problem, which is the same problem as lettericity except that the $w_i$ are fixed; we show it to be NP-complete (Theorem 13), which, in tandem with our NP-completeness result for coloring extension, contrasts with the known result that when the constraint of the coloring extension problem and the constraint of the word extension problem are both applied to lettericity, lettericity can be decided in polynomial time. Additionally, we use the reduction in the NP-completeness proof to show that unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis is false, there cannot exist a deterministic algorithm to decide whether the lettericity of an $n$-vertex graph is at most $k$ in time $2^{o(n)}$, even when $n = 6k$ (Theorem 11).

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

NP-Hardness of Bounded Distance Decoding for Reed-Solomon Codes

For an $[n,K]$ Reed--Solomon code, the covering radius is $n-K$. Gandikota, Ghazi, and Grigorescu proved deterministic NP-hardness of bounded-distance decoding when the decoding radius is $d$ below the covering radius for every $1\le d\le c\log n/\log\log n$, where $c>0$ is an absolute constant. We prove that, for every fixed rational $0<α<1/2$, bounded-distance decoding is NP-complete under deterministic polynomial-time many-one reductions over explicitly represented finite extension fields for the additive gap $d=\lfloor n^α\rfloor$ below the covering radius. The hard codes have odd block length~$n$, dimension $K=(n+1)/2-d$, decoding radius $(n-1)/2$, and rate tending to $1/2$. The alphabet size is subexponential in the evaluation set size: for a fixed $0<η<1$ depending only on $α$, it is $2^{Θ(n^η\log n)}=2^{o(n)}$. The proof passes through moments subset sum on $n-1$ nonzero field elements, with required subset size $(n-1)/2$ and $d$ prescribed moments. The arithmetic ingredient is a uniform positive-completion theorem over prime fields $\mathbb{F}_q$ with $q\ge d^{2+ρ}$, for any fixed $ρ>0$. A sharper form follows from a higher-dimensional point-count estimate based on Deligne's theorem; the weaker form used in our reduction is proved more elementarily using additive-character orthogonality, the one-variable Weil bound, a moment identity of order $2d$, and Newton identities. A universal completion pool, an extension-field quotient construction, and a deterministic linear-size simultaneous power condenser complete the reduction.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Constant-Probability Witness Isolation Implies $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{P/poly}$

Valiant and Vazirani isolate a satisfying assignment of a circuit with probability $Ω(1/n)$. Dell, Kabanets, van Melkebeek, and Watanabe showed that success above $2/3$ implies $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{P/poly}$ and asked about the range in between. We show that every positive constant already implies the collapse: if a randomized nonuniform polynomial-size pruning procedure succeeds with probability $ε$ on affine circuit inputs with at most $2^{\lfloor 2/ε\rfloor}$ satisfying assignments, then $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{P/poly}$. Success $10/\log L$ on affine inputs with at most $L^{1/3}$ satisfying assignments suffices, where $L$ is the description length, and on inputs with one or two satisfying assignments the threshold $2/3$ drops to $3/5$. No cryptographic assumption is used, and the procedure may read the entire circuit. The proof compiles a pool of circuits into one circuit whose satisfying assignments are indexed by tags in $\mathbb{F}_2^d$. Each member is assigned an affine region of tag space, and if one member is unsatisfiable, the satisfying set shrinks to that member's region. Because regions may overlap and have different dimensions, the collapse reduces to a combinatorial bound: no set of tags meets more than a $2/d$ fraction of an equally weighted family of affine subspaces of all dimensions below $d$ in exactly one point. This regional counting cannot go below order $1/\log L$. The range between $Θ(1/n)$, achieved by affine hashing, and $O(1/\log n)$ remains open.

cs.CC↗