Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.09720

Characterization of the forcing and sub-filter scale terms in the volume-filtering immersed boundary method

Dave Himanshu·Herrmann Marcus·Brady Peter·M. Houssem Kasbaoui
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a characterization of the forcing and the sub-filter scale terms produced in the volume-filtering immersed boundary (VF-IB) method by Dave et al, JCP, 2023. The process of volume-filtering produces bodyforces in the form of surface integrals to describe the boundary conditions at the interface. Furthermore, the approach also produces unclosed subfilter scale (SFS) terms. The level of contribution from SFS terms on the numerical solution depends on the filter width. In order to understand these terms better, we take a 2 dimensional, varying coefficient hyperbolic equation shown by Brady & Liverscu, JCP, 2021. This case is chosen for two reasons. First, the case involves 2 distinct regions seperated by an interface, making it an ideal case for the VF-IB method. Second, an existing analytical solution allows us to properly investigate the contribution from SFS term for varying filter sizes. The latter controls how well resolved the interface is. The smaller the filter size, the more resolved the interface will be. A thorough numerical analysis of the method is presented, as well as the effect of the SFS term on the numerical solution. In order to perform a direct comparison, the numerical solution is compared to the filtered analytical solution. Through this, we highlight three important points. First, we present a methodical approach to volume filtering a hyperbolic PDE. Second, we show that the VF-IB method exhibits second order convergence with respect to decreasing filter size (i.e. making the interface sharper). Finally, we show that the SFS term scales with square the filter size. Large filter sizes require modeling the SFS term. However, for sufficiently finer filters, the SFS term can be ignored without any significant reduction in the accuracy of solution.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.NAphysics.flu-dyn

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dave Himanshu, Herrmann Marcus, Brady Peter, M. Houssem Kasbaoui. 2024-07-12. Characterization of the forcing and sub-filter scale terms in the volume-filtering immersed boundary method. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09720

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How many continuous measurements are needed to learn a vector?

One can recover vectors from $\mathbb{R}^m$ with arbitrary precision, using only $\lceil \log_2(m)\rceil +1$ continuous measurements that are chosen adaptively. This surprising result is explained and discussed, and we present applications to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

IterativeCUR: Large Rank-Adaptive Approximation From a Small Recycled Sketch

The computation of accurate low-rank matrix approximations is central to improving the scalability of various techniques in machine learning, uncertainty quantification, and control. Traditionally, low-rank approximations are constructed using SVD-based approaches such as truncated SVD or Randomized SVD. Although these SVD approaches---especially Randomized SVD---have proven to be very computationally efficient, other low-rank approximation methods can offer even greater performance. One such approach is the CUR decomposition, which forms a low-rank approximation using direct row and column subsets of a matrix. Because CUR uses direct matrix subsets, it is also often better able to preserve native matrix structures like sparsity or non-negativity than SVD-based approaches and can facilitate data interpretation in many contexts. This paper introduces IterativeCUR, which draws on previous work in randomized numerical linear algebra to build a new algorithm that is highly competitive compared to prior work. IterativeCUR is adaptive in the sense that it takes as an input parameter the desired tolerance $ε$ and outputs (with arbitrarily high probability) an approximation of error bounded by $ε$, rather than requiring an a priori guess of the numerical rank. IterativeCUR typically runs significantly faster than both existing CUR algorithms and techniques such as Randomized SVD. Its asymptotic complexity is $\mathcal{O}(mn + (m+n)r^2)$ for an $m\times n$ matrix of output rank $r$. IterativeCUR relies on a single small sketch from the matrix that is successively downdated as the algorithm proceeds. We demonstrate through extensive experiments that IterativeCUR achieves up to $4\times$ speed-up over state-of-the-art pivoting-on-sketch approaches with no loss of accuracy, and up to $40\times$ speed-up over rank-adaptive randomized SVD approaches.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Multigrid with Linear Storage Complexity

As the discretization error for the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) decreases, the precision required to store the corresponding coefficients naturally increases. Storing the solution's finite element coefficients explicitly requires $\mathcal O(n \log n)$ bits of storage, where $n$ is the number of degrees of freedom (DoFs). This paper presents a full multigrid method to compute the solution in a compressed format that reduces the storage complexity of the solution and intermediate vectors to $\mathcal O(n)$ bits. This reduction allows a matrix-free implementation to solve elliptic PDEs with an overall linear space complexity. For problems limited by the memory capacity of current supercomputers, we expect a memory footprint reduction of about an order of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art mixed-precision methods. We demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm by solving two model problems. Depending on the PDE and polynomial degree, but irrespective of the problem size, the solution vector on the finest grid requires between 4 and 12 bits per DoF, and the residual and correction require 3 to 6 bits each. Additional data is stored on the coarse grids with modestly increasing bit widths toward coarser grids.

math.NA↗