On the Viability of Semi-Supervised Segmentation Methods for Statistical Shape Modeling

Abstract

Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) excel at identifying population level anatomical variations, which is at the core of various clinical and biomedical applications, including morphology-based diagnostics and surgical planning. However, the effectiveness of SSMs is often constrained by the necessity for expert-driven manual segmentation, a time-intensive and expensive process that restricts their broader utility. While deep learning approaches offer a potential workaround by directly estimating SSMs from unsegmented images, they merely shift the burden. Although these models do not require segmentation during deployment, they still fail to address the challenge of acquiring the manual annotations needed for training, particularly in resource-limited settings. Semi-supervised models for anatomy segmentation present a logical solution to the annotation burden. However, the lack of established guidelines leaves end-users uncertain about the actual effectiveness of these approaches for the downstream task of constructing SSMs. In this study, we bridge this gap by systematically evaluating semi-supervised methods as viable alternatives to manual segmentation. By applying these methods under low-annotation settings and utilizing the predicted segmentations for SSM generation, we establish a comprehensive new performance benchmark. Our findings reveal a clear divide in performance: while certain methods yield noisy segmentations that degrade SSM quality, others accurately capture the population's modes of variation comparable to those obtained from manual-segmentation SSMs despite a 60-80% reduction in manual annotation requirements.