Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2407.17084

Effect of Austerity Measures on Infant Mortality: Evidence from Greece

Abstract

This study examines the effect of fiscal austerity measures on infant mortality in Greece. Austerity measures were initiated by the tripartite committee and implemented between 2010 and 2017 to counteract deep fiscal deficit and large public debt. By comparing Greece with a plausible donor pool of OECD and Mediterranean member states in the period 1991-2020, we estimate a series of missing counterfactual scenarios to evaluate the infant mortality effects of large-scale reduction in spending on health care. A series of hybrid synthetic control and difference-in-differences estimates indicate a unique and pervasive increase in infant mortality after the implementation of austerity measures. Compared to a plausible OECD and Mediterranean counterfactual scenario, pro-cyclical austerity measures are associated with derailed and permanently increased infant mortality up to the present day. Our estimates suggest that compared to a plausible counterfactual scenario, the cumulative infant mortality cost of austerity policies exceeds 10,000 infant deaths or slightly less than 850 deaths for each year of the austerity policies. Notably, mortality increases are concentrated among boys. The estimated impacts survive a battery of rigorous robustness and placebo tests.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert J. Kolesar, Rok Spruk. 2024-07-24. Effect of Austerity Measures on Infant Mortality: Evidence from Greece. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17084

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN