Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2407.17293

Fintech and MSEs Innovation: an Empirical Analysis

Abstract

Employing a comprehensive survey of micro and small enterprises (MSEs) and the Digital Financial Inclusion Index in China, this study investigates the influence of fintech on MSE innovation empirically. Our findings indicate that fintech advancement substantially enhances the likelihood of MSEs engaging in innovative endeavors and boosts both the investment and outcomes of their innovation processes. The underlying mechanisms are attributed to fintech's role in fostering long-term strategic incentives and investment in human capital. This includes the use of promotions and stock options as rewards, rather than traditional perks like gifts or trips, the attraction of a greater number of university graduates, and the increase in both training expenses and the remuneration of technical staff. Our heterogeneity analysis reveals that fintech exerts a more pronounced effect on MSEs situated in economically developed areas, those that are five years old or younger, and businesses with limited assets and workforce. Additionally, we uncover that fintech stimulates the innovation of MSEs' independent research and development (R\&D) efforts. This paper contributes to the understanding of the nuanced ways in which fintech impacts MSE innovation and offers policy insights aimed at unleashing the full potential of MSEs' innovative capabilities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Siyu Chen, Qing Guo. 2024-07-24. Fintech and MSEs Innovation: an Empirical Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17293

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN