Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2408.02988

Fast Whole-Brain MR Multi-Parametric Mapping with Scan-Specific Self-Supervised Networks

Abstract

Quantification of tissue parameters using MRI is emerging as a powerful tool in clinical diagnosis and research studies. The need for multiple long scans with different acquisition parameters prohibits quantitative MRI from reaching widespread adoption in routine clinical and research exams. Accelerated parameter mapping techniques leverage parallel imaging, signal modelling and deep learning to offer more practical quantitative MRI acquisitions. However, the achievable acceleration and the quality of maps are often limited. Joint MAPLE is a recent state-of-the-art multi-parametric and scan-specific parameter mapping technique with promising performance at high acceleration rates. It synergistically combines parallel imaging, model-based and machine learning approaches for joint mapping of T1, T2*, proton density and the field inhomogeneity. However, Joint MAPLE suffers from prohibitively long reconstruction time to estimate the maps from a multi-echo, multi-flip angle (MEMFA) dataset at high resolution in a scan-specific manner. In this work, we propose a faster version of Joint MAPLE which retains the mapping performance of the original version. Coil compression, random slice selection, parameter-specific learning rates and transfer learning are synergistically combined in the proposed framework. It speeds-up the reconstruction time up to 700 times than the original version and processes a whole-brain MEMFA dataset in 21 minutes on average, which originally requires ~260 hours for Joint MAPLE. The mapping performance of the proposed framework is ~2-fold better than the standard and the state-of-the-art evaluated reconstruction techniques on average in terms of the root mean squared error.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amir Heydari, Abbas Ahmadi, Tae Hyung Kim, Berkin Bilgic. 2024-08-06. Fast Whole-Brain MR Multi-Parametric Mapping with Scan-Specific Self-Supervised Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02988

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Lightning-fast adaptive immune receptor similarity search by symmetric deletion lookup

An individual's adaptive immune receptor (AIR) repertoire records immune history due to the receptors' antigen specificity. Reading this record requires computational approaches for inferring receptor function from sequence, as the diversity of possible receptor-antigen pairs vastly outstrips experimental knowledge. Identification of AIRs with similar sequence and thus putatively similar function is a common performance bottleneck in these approaches. Here, we benchmark the runtime scaling of five algorithmic approaches to radius-based search for Levenshtein neighbors. We show that a symmetric deletion lookup approach, originally proposed for spell-checking, is particularly scalable. We introduce SymScan and XTNeighbor, optimized CPU and GPU software implementing a parallelized variant of the algorithm. For one million input sequences, these tools identify all sequence pairs that differ by one or two edits in seconds, orders of magnitude faster than existing approaches. We demonstrate how symmetric deletion lookup can be integrated as a pre-filtering step in T cell receptor metaclone discovery and B cell receptor lineage identification. Our contribution is poised to greatly accelerate existing analysis pipelines and enable processing of immunosequencing data at scale.

q-bio.QM

Implication of modelling choices on connectivity estimation: A comparative analysis

Landscape connectivity is an important field with important conservation implications. Connectivity modelling is a useful tool to inform and guide landscape planning. However, it involves assumptions and methodological decisions which ultimately impact connectivity outcomes. In order to understand the implications of modelling choices on final connectivity estimations, we compare two landscape characterisation approaches - expert knowledge and species distribution models - and three movements models - least-cost paths, circuit theory and an individual-based movement simulator. The implementation of the models and the construction of the analyses scope highlighted conceptual and methodological differences that made the comparison difficult. Landscape characterisation appears as the principal factor determining connectivity outcomes. Therefore, the confrontation between expert knowledge and species distribution models is critical to leverage points of convergence and complementarity between these two approaches. Conceptual differences between movement models are reported on connectivity map and habitat patch contribution estimations. In the want of data and protocol design specifically to validate connectivity models, approaches that integrate stochastic and behavioural processes, bring a more realistic perspective to connectivity estimation.

q-bio.QM

Triplication: an important component of the modern scientific method

A scientific-study protocol (defined) is designed to deliver results from which inductive inference is allowed. In the nineteenth century, triplication was introduced into the plant sciences and Fisher's p<0.05 rule (1925) incorporated into triple-result protocols designed to counter random/systematic errors which contribute to real-world variability. The aims of the present study were to: (1) classify replication protocols; (2) assess their prevalence in plant-science studies (published during one twenty-first-century year; for defined variable construct); (3) explore triplication rationale. Methods: a plant-sciences protocol-prevalence report was produced; experimental/associational-study proportions analyzed; and real-world-data proxies used to show confidence-interval-width patterns with increasing replicate number. Results: 25% plant-science studies analyzed showed triplication, including 11% triple-result protocols (including greater replicate numbers: 48%;17%, respectively). Theoretical considerations indicated that even if systematic errors predominate, (previously-known) square-root rules sometimes apply, contributing to triplication importance (exemplified by real-world-data proxies). Conclusions: The defined protocols, with minor modifications, should provide the means for assessment of most sciences. Triplication was extensively applied in studies analysed and there are strong methodological reasons why triplication, rather than duplication/quadruplication, is the appropriate standard: triple-result protocols: (a) effectively reduce false positives to acceptable levels; (b) give qualitatively-different information (shape) from duplication; (c) have a large efficiency advantage (concerning confidence-interval widths) over quadruplication. The application of batch replication is not, primarily, a statistical problem and cannot effectively be replaced by simulation.

q-bio.QM