Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2408.04230

Enabling Communication via APIs for Mainframe Applications

Abstract

Mainframe systems continue to support critical applications across industries such as banking, retail, and healthcare. Exposing their functionality through Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) enables reuse and development of new applications, but identifying and implementing APIs for legacy code remains challenging. It requires understanding complex programs, separating dependent components, introducing new artifacts, and preserving functionality and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) such as Turnaround Time (TAT). We propose a framework for APIfication of legacy mainframe applications. Candidate APIs are identified from artifacts such as transactions, screens, control-flow blocks, inter-microservice calls, business rules, and data accesses. Static analyses, including liveness and reaching definitions, are then used to traverse the code and automatically compute API signatures consisting of request and response fields. We evaluated the framework through a qualitative survey of nine mainframe developers with an average of 15 years of experience, using the public GENAPP application and two industrial mainframe applications. The results show that the framework identifies additional candidate APIs and reduces implementation effort for APIfication. The API-signature computation has been incorporated into IBM watsonx Code Assistant for Z Refactoring Assistant. We further validated the identified APIs by executing them on an IBM Z mainframe system, demonstrating the practical viability of the approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vini Kanvar, Ashwin Dhinesh Kumar, Srikanth Tamilselvam, Keerthi Narayan Raghunath. 2026-09-14. Enabling Communication via APIs for Mainframe Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04230

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Search-based Trace Diagnostic for Cyber-Physical Systems

Cyber-physical systems (CPS) development requires verifying whether system behaviors violate their requirements. This analysis often considers system behaviors expressed by execution traces and requirements expressed by signal-based temporal properties. When an execution trace violates a requirement, engineers must solve the trace diagnostic problem---they need to understand the cause of the breach. Automated trace diagnostic techniques aim to support engineers in the trace diagnostic activity. This paper proposes search-based trace diagnostic (SBTD), a novel trace diagnostic technique for CPS requirements. Unlike existing techniques, SBTD relies on evolutionary search. SBTD starts from a set of candidate diagnoses, applies an evolutionary algorithm to generate new candidate diagnoses (via mutation, recombination, and selection), and uses a fitness function to determine the qualities of these solutions. Then, a diagnostic generator step is performed to explain the cause of the trace violation. We implemented Diagnosis, an SBTD tool for signal-based temporal logic requirements expressed using the Hybrid Logic of Signals (HLS). We evaluated Diagnosis by performing 34 experiments for 17 trace-requirement combinations for property violations. We assessed the effectiveness of SBTD in producing informative diagnoses and its efficiency. Diagnosis achieved expert-aligned diagnoses for 29/34 experiments and scaled to the full HLS benchmark, whereas state-of-the-art literature remained restricted to a subset due to performance and language limitations. SBTD treats trace-checking as a black box, which makes the checker replaceable. Substituting our HLS checker for an STL monitor, e.g., RTAMT, reproduces on two requirements the diagnoses at two to three orders of magnitude lower per-check cost.

cs.SE

Toward Secure Code Generation: Bridging Correctness and Security via Task-Adaptive Vulnerability Modeling and Execution-Based Benchmarking

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for program synthesis, yet they often generate code that is functionally plausible but insecure. Progress in secure code generation has been hindered by benchmarks that are small, non-executable, leak mitigation details, or rely on noisy analyzers and subjective judgments, making it difficult to measure whether security improves without sacrificing correctness. We address these gaps with CodeSecEval, an execution-based benchmark for secure code generation, comprising 255 Python tasks spanning 77 CWE categories. Each task provides paired insecure and secure implementations together with executable functional and vulnerability-targeted security tests, enabling precise and reproducible evaluation of secure code generation and insecure-code repair. Building on CodeSecEval, we propose SecAwareCoder, an agent-based framework that shifts code generation toward secure-by-construction synthesis. SecAwareCoder performs task-adaptive threat modeling to identify security-sensitive regions and derive task-grounded vulnerability hypotheses, uses these hypotheses to guide both constraint-aware code generation and security-aware test synthesis, and leverages execution feedback for targeted refinement. Experiments across multiple LLM backbones show that SecAwareCoder consistently improves Pass@1 and security robustness over prompting and analyzer-driven baselines, narrowing the security--correctness gap in LLM code generation.

cs.SE

LogICL: Demonstration Retrieval to Bridge the Semantic Gap in Cross-Domain Log Anomaly Detection

Effective log anomaly detection is critical to sustaining reliability in large-scale IT infrastructures. Transformer-based language models have advanced the field but require substantial computational resources and labeled data, exacerbating the cold-start problem in target domains with scarce logs. Cross-domain methods alleviate data scarcity by leveraging source-domain logs, but their reliance on surface lexical similarity limits generalization when structural and terminological differences obscure semantic equivalence. We propose LogICL, a demonstration-retrieval framework for cross-domain log anomaly detection. During training, LogICL constructs a sparse delta matrix by measuring the signed change in a frozen LLM's prediction error between zero-shot and one-shot inference for selected query-demonstration pairs. This outcome-level feedback supervises a lightweight encoder through a demonstration-utility loss, while maximum mean discrepancy and supervised contrastive losses promote domain alignment and anomaly discrimination. At inference, the encoder retrieves similarity-based anchors and expands them with candidates having the highest scores aggregated over precomputed positive delta relations. Thus, LogICL retrieves high-utility demonstrations without candidate-wise LLM evaluation and provides them to a frozen LLM for in-context anomaly prediction. Experiments on few-shot and target-domain zero-shot transfer benchmarks demonstrate strong performance across heterogeneous log systems. In the few-shot setting, LogICL outperforms Random-ICL and kNN-ICL in three of four transfers under the fixed split, while the benefit remains setting-dependent. Further analysis shows that LogICL can identify demonstrations with positive predictive utility despite low surface lexical similarity, helping bridge the semantic gap across logging systems.

cs.SE