Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2408.05313

Discrete-time treatment number

Abstract

We introduce the discrete-time treatment number of a graph, in which each vertex is in exactly one of three states at any given time-step: compromised, vulnerable, or treated. Our treatment number is distinct from other graph searching parameters that use only two states, such as the firefighter problem or Bernshteyn and Lee's inspection number. Vertices represent individuals and edges exist between individuals with close connections. Each vertex starts out as compromised; it can become compromised again even after treatment. Our objective is to treat the entire population so that at the last time-step, no members are vulnerable or compromised, while minimizing the maximum number of treatments that occur at each time-step. This minimum is the treatment number, and it depends on the choice of a pre-determined length of time $r$ that a vertex can remain in a treated state and length of time $s$ that a vertex can remain in a vulnerable state without being treated again. We denote the pathwidth of graph $H$ by $pw(H)$ and prove that the treatment number of $H$ is bounded above by $\lceil \frac{1+pw(H)}{r+s}\rceil$. This equals the best possible lower bound for a cautious treatment plan, defined as one in which each vertex, after being treated for the first time, is treated again within every consecutive $r+s$ time-steps until its last treatment. However, many graphs admit a plan that is not cautious. When $r=s=1$, we find a useful tool for proving lower bounds, show that the treatment number of an $n\times n$ grid equals $\lceil\frac{1+n}{2}\rceil$, characterize graphs that require only one treatment per time-step, and prove that subdividing one edge can reduce the treatment number. It is known that there are trees with arbitrarily large pathwidth; surprisingly, we prove that for any tree $T$, there is a subdivision of $T$ that requires at most two treatments per time-step.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N. E. Clarke, K. L. Collins, M. E. Messinger, A. N. Trenk, A. Vetta. 2025-10-09. Discrete-time treatment number. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05313

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Rooted Spider Embeddings and the Erd\H os-Sós Conjecture

Under a local density condition, we prove that every $k$-edge spider embeds at any prescribed center of degree at least $k$, unless all legs are even and the host graph has one of two specified structures. These structures contain complete bipartite subgraphs with prescribed neighborhoods. The proof uses path rerouting and three exchange lemmas that describe equality in neighborhood estimates. As a consequence, we recover the Erd\H os-Sós bound for all spiders.

math.CO

Generalized Goulden-Yong duals and signed minimal factorizations

In this paper, we give two combinatorial ways to study signed exceptional sequences. First, we show the equivalence between one-way reflections and relatively projective representations. Secondly, we construct generalized Goulden-Yong duals using reverse Garside element actions and folded chord diagrams. We then give two applications of the generalized Goulden-Yong duals: constructing generalized Prüfer codes and counting signed factorizations using the matrix-tree theorem.

math.CO

Explicit expressions for iterates of power series

We present several formulas for both the discrete and fractional iterates of an invertible power series $f$, using a new unifying approach based on umbral calculus. Known formulas are extended, and their proofs simplified, while new expressions are introduced. In particular, by employing $q$-calculus identities, we eliminate the requirement for $f'(0)$ to equal $1$ and the resulting general expressions for the iterative logarithm are obtained as well.

math.CO