Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2408.05853

Predictors and Socio-Demographic Disparities in STEM Degree Outcomes: A UK Longitudinal Study using Hierarchical Logistic Regression

Abstract

Socio-demographic disparities in STEM degree outcomes impact the diversity of the UK's future workforce, particularly in fields essential for innovation and growth. Despite the importance of institution-level, longitudinal analyses in understanding degree awarding gaps, detailed multivariate and hierarchical analyses remain limited within the UK context. This study addresses this gap by using a multivariate binary logistic model with random intercepts for STEM subjects to analyse predictors of first-class degree outcomes using a nine-year dataset (2014 to 2022) from a research-intensive Russell Group university. We find that prior academic attainment, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, disability, age, and course duration are significant predictors of achieving a first-class degree, with Average Marginal Effects calculated to provide insight into probability differences across these groups. Key findings reveal that Black students face a significantly lower likelihood of achieving first-class degrees compared to White students, with an average 16 percent lower probability, while students graduating from 4-year degree programmes have an average 24 percent higher probability of achieving a first-class degree relative to those on 3-year programmes. Although male students received a higher proportion of first-class degrees overall, our multivariate hierarchical model shows higher odds for female students, underscoring the importance of model choice when quantifying awarding gaps. Baseline odds for first-class outcomes rose considerably from 2016, peaking in 2021, indicating possible grade inflation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interaction effects between socio-demographic variables and graduation year indicate stability in ethnicity, disability, and socioeconomic awarding gaps but reveal a declining advantage for female students over time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrew M. Low, Z. Yasemin Kalender. 2024-11-04. Predictors and Socio-Demographic Disparities in STEM Degree Outcomes: A UK Longitudinal Study using Hierarchical Logistic Regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05853

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Addressing misconceptions in university physics: A review and experiences from quantum physics educators

Students often begin physics courses with misconceptions rooted in everyday experience and intuition, which can be resistant to change. While research has identified strategies for addressing misconceptions across physics, it remains unclear whether different domains, like classical and quantum physics, require different approaches. Quantum concepts can pose different representational and mathematical demands, while both domains require instructors to elicit and develop students' reasoning. To support discussion of these instructional challenges, we organize selected literature on addressing misconceptions in physics education and summarize instructors' accounts. The overview groups 122 distinct works into four categories, with further subcategories. A preliminary framework developed from existing review literature informed the interview guide. We interviewed 12 instructors from the University of Waterloo's Institute for Quantum Computing and the Perimeter Institute, who have collectively taught over 100 quantum courses. The accounts describe difficulties involving instructional representations, prerequisite knowledge, and the interpretation of students' reasoning, alongside reported diagnostic and instructional responses. We draw these accounts and the literature together as questions for instructional planning. The report does not resolve the intended classical--quantum comparison or establish comparative instructional effectiveness.

physics.ed-ph

Johann Bernoulli's analysis of elastic collisions (a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law thereby inspired)

In order to explain an elastic collision, Johann Bernoulli considered two bodies connected by a spring. Motion is defined as a succession of states of rest. Then, considering the spring to be a lever with a body at each extremity, the laws of equilibrium imply that `motion' is described by the time variation of the (common) quantity of motion of the bodies; the dynamic law is thus deduced. This inspires a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law (in one dimension) in introductory physics course; we call it ``bernoullian sequence''.

physics.ed-ph

Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics

Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.

physics.ed-ph