Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2408.07271

The Concentration Risk Indicator: Raising the Bar for Financial Stability and Portfolio Performance Measurement

Abstract

We have developed a novel risk management measure called the concentration risk indicator (CRI). The CRI has been created to address drawbacks with prevailing methodologies and to supplement existing methods. Modified and adapted from the Herfindahl-Hirschman (HH) index, the CRI can give a single numeric score that can be helpful to evaluate the extent of risks that arise from holding concentrated portfolios. We discuss how the CRI can become an indicator of financial stability at any desired aggregation unit: regional, national or international level. We show how the CRI can be easily applied to insurance risk and to any product portfolio mix. The CRI is particularly applicable to the current facet of the decentralized terrain, wherein the majority of the wealth is restricted to a small number of tokens. We calculate and report the CRI -- along with other risk metrics -- for individual assets and portfolios of crypto assets using a daily data sample from January 01, 2019 until August 10, 2022. The CRI is an example of developing metrics that can useful for sending concise yet powerful messages to the relevant audience. This tactic -- which can be described as marketing the benefits of any product or service by using concepts from multiple disciplines -- of creating new metrics goes further beyond the use of metrics to evaluate marketing efficacy. The simplicity of our metric -- and the intuitive explanations we have provided for the CRI -- makes it straightforward to properly articulate a strong -- clear and positive -- signal as part of marketing campaigns. The development -- and implementation -- of new risk management metrics will have greater impact when a wider rigorous risk management process has been established. We discuss several topics related to bringing about more improved risk management across all types of institutions and assets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ravi Kashyap. 2024-08-14. The Concentration Risk Indicator: Raising the Bar for Financial Stability and Portfolio Performance Measurement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07271

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic reinsurance via martingale transport

We formulate a dynamic reinsurance problem in which the insurer seeks to satisfy prescribed terminal moment or risk-based constraints while minimizing the $L^2$-norm of the ceded risk. As a tool for this analysis, we first use techniques from martingale optimal transport to study the auxiliary problem in which the insurer matches a given terminal distribution of the surplus process. We show that, under suitable assumptions, this auxiliary problem admits a tractable solution analogous to the Bass martingale. We then relax this condition by only requiring certain moment or risk-based constraints.

q-fin.RM

Risk Measures under Paired-Ambiguity: A Deep Learning Reflected BSDE Framework

We study optimal stopping under dynamic risk measures with simultaneous ambiguity in the probability model and the discount rate. We introduce a paired ambiguity framework combining Girsanov model uncertainty with cash subadditive risk evaluation and characterize the stopping value by an upper reflected backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE). We establish structural properties of the resulting stopping operator and study quadratic drivers associated with entropic risk measures, obtaining explicit stopping rules in several benchmark cases. We then develop a deep learning scheme for the reflected quadratic BSDE. The convergence analysis uses discrete reflection and truncation to reduce the quadratic problem to a globally Lipschitz system and combines reflected BSDE discretization estimates with neural network approximation errors. Numerical experiments for American options illustrate the effects of discount rate and entropic ambiguity on stopping values and exercise decisions.

q-fin.RM

When Is the Gini Loading More Prudent? Tail Structure and the Ordering of the Standard Deviation and the Gini Mean Difference

The standard deviation (SD) and the Gini mean difference (GMD) are the two canonical measures of variability used to load premiums, set risk margins and allocate capital, yet no universal ordering between them exists. We show that the comparison is \emph{equivalent} to asking whether the coefficient of variation of the spacing $|X-X'|$ generated by two independent copies of the risk exceeds unity, so that the exponential law -- whose spacing is again exponential -- is the universal knife-edge separating the two regimes. Reading the GMD as twice the maxiance, that is, as a second-order \emph{dual} moment in the sense of Yaari's dual theory, the problem becomes an explicit comparison of primal and dual second-order variability. We derive a closed-form representation of the mean excess function of the spacing in terms of the hazard and reverse hazard rates of $X$, and use it to prove that heavy-tailed behavior -- a decreasing hazard rate or an increasing reverse hazard rate -- yields SD dominance, whereas two-sided light tails yield GMD dominance; within the monotone aging classes, equality characterizes the exponential law. Both regimes are stable under truncation, convolution and mixing, which makes them operational in collective risk and frailty models. We classify the severity, lifetime and frequency distributions of actuarial practice accordingly, quantify the consequences for SD- and Gini-loaded premium principles and for Gini-type tail risk measures, and show that the sign of $\mathrm{SD}-\mathrm{GMD}$ across thresholds furnishes a simple diagnostic for tail aging.

q-fin.RM