Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2408.10459

Distinct Numerical Solutions for Elliptic Cross-Interface Problems Using Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods

Qiwei Feng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the second-order finite element method (FEM) and finite difference method (FDM) for numerically solving elliptic cross-interface problems characterized by vertical and horizontal straight lines, piecewise constant coefficients, two homogeneous jump conditions, continuous source terms, and Dirichlet boundary conditions. For brevity, we consider a 2D simplified version where the intersection points of the interface lines coincide with grid points in uniform Cartesian grids. Our findings reveal interesting and important results: (1) When the coefficient functions exhibit either high jumps with low-frequency oscillations or low jumps with high-frequency oscillations, the finite element method and finite difference method yield similar numerical solutions. (2) However, when the interface problems involve high-contrast and high-frequency coefficient functions, the numerical solutions obtained from the finite element and finite difference methods differ significantly. Given that the widely studied SPE10 benchmark problem (see https://www.spe.org/web/csp/datasets/set02.htm) typically involves high-contrast and high-frequency permeability due to varying geological layers in porous media, this phenomenon warrants attention. Furthermore, this observation is particularly important for developing multiscale methods, as reference solutions for these methods are usually obtained using the standard second-order finite element method with a fine mesh, and analytical solutions are not available. We provide sufficient details to enable replication of our numerical results, and the implementation is straightforward. This simplicity ensures that readers can easily confirm the validity of our findings.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.NA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Qiwei Feng. 2024-11-01. Distinct Numerical Solutions for Elliptic Cross-Interface Problems Using Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10459

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How many continuous measurements are needed to learn a vector?

One can recover vectors from $\mathbb{R}^m$ with arbitrary precision, using only $\lceil \log_2(m)\rceil +1$ continuous measurements that are chosen adaptively. This surprising result is explained and discussed, and we present applications to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

IterativeCUR: Large Rank-Adaptive Approximation From a Small Recycled Sketch

The computation of accurate low-rank matrix approximations is central to improving the scalability of various techniques in machine learning, uncertainty quantification, and control. Traditionally, low-rank approximations are constructed using SVD-based approaches such as truncated SVD or Randomized SVD. Although these SVD approaches---especially Randomized SVD---have proven to be very computationally efficient, other low-rank approximation methods can offer even greater performance. One such approach is the CUR decomposition, which forms a low-rank approximation using direct row and column subsets of a matrix. Because CUR uses direct matrix subsets, it is also often better able to preserve native matrix structures like sparsity or non-negativity than SVD-based approaches and can facilitate data interpretation in many contexts. This paper introduces IterativeCUR, which draws on previous work in randomized numerical linear algebra to build a new algorithm that is highly competitive compared to prior work. IterativeCUR is adaptive in the sense that it takes as an input parameter the desired tolerance $ε$ and outputs (with arbitrarily high probability) an approximation of error bounded by $ε$, rather than requiring an a priori guess of the numerical rank. IterativeCUR typically runs significantly faster than both existing CUR algorithms and techniques such as Randomized SVD. Its asymptotic complexity is $\mathcal{O}(mn + (m+n)r^2)$ for an $m\times n$ matrix of output rank $r$. IterativeCUR relies on a single small sketch from the matrix that is successively downdated as the algorithm proceeds. We demonstrate through extensive experiments that IterativeCUR achieves up to $4\times$ speed-up over state-of-the-art pivoting-on-sketch approaches with no loss of accuracy, and up to $40\times$ speed-up over rank-adaptive randomized SVD approaches.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Multigrid with Linear Storage Complexity

As the discretization error for the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) decreases, the precision required to store the corresponding coefficients naturally increases. Storing the solution's finite element coefficients explicitly requires $\mathcal O(n \log n)$ bits of storage, where $n$ is the number of degrees of freedom (DoFs). This paper presents a full multigrid method to compute the solution in a compressed format that reduces the storage complexity of the solution and intermediate vectors to $\mathcal O(n)$ bits. This reduction allows a matrix-free implementation to solve elliptic PDEs with an overall linear space complexity. For problems limited by the memory capacity of current supercomputers, we expect a memory footprint reduction of about an order of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art mixed-precision methods. We demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm by solving two model problems. Depending on the PDE and polynomial degree, but irrespective of the problem size, the solution vector on the finest grid requires between 4 and 12 bits per DoF, and the residual and correction require 3 to 6 bits each. Additional data is stored on the coarse grids with modestly increasing bit widths toward coarser grids.

math.NA↗