Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2408.12433

Technology and Performance Benchmarks of IQM's 20-Qubit Quantum Computer

Leonid Abdurakhimov·Janos Adam·Hasnain Ahmad·Olli Ahonen·Manuel Algaba·Guillermo Alonso·Ville Bergholm·Rohit Beriwal·Matthias Beuerle·Clinton Bockstiegel·Alessio Calzona·Chun Fai Chan·Daniele Cucurachi·Saga Dahl·Rakhim Davletkaliyev·Olexiy Fedorets·Alejandro Gomez Frieiro·Zheming Gao·Johan Guldmyr·Andrew Guthrie·Juha Hassel·Hermanni Heimonen·Johannes Heinsoo·Tuukka Hiltunen·Keiran Holland·Juho Hotari·Hao Hsu·Antti Huhtala·Eric Hyyppä·Aleksi Hämäläinen·Joni Ikonen·Sinan Inel·David Janzso·Teemu Jaakkola·Mate Jenei·Shan Jolin·Kristinn Juliusson·Jaakko Jussila·Shabeeb Khalid·Seung-Goo Kim·Miikka Koistinen·Roope Kokkoniemi·Anton Komlev·Caspar Ockeloen-Korppi·Otto Koskinen·Janne Kotilahti·Toivo Kuisma·Vladimir Kukushkin·Kari Kumpulainen·Ilari Kuronen·Joonas Kylmälä·Niclas Lamponen·Julia Lamprich·Alessandro Landra·Martin Leib·Tianyi Li·Per Liebermann·Aleksi Lintunen·Wei Liu·Jürgen Luus·Fabian Marxer·Arianne Meijer-van de Griend·Kunal Mitra·Jalil Khatibi Moqadam·Jakub Mrożek·Henrikki Mäkynen·Janne Mäntylä·Tiina Naaranoja·Francesco Nappi·Janne Niemi·Lucas Ortega·Mario Palma·Miha Papič·Matti Partanen·Jari Penttilä·Alexander Plyushch·Wei Qiu·Aniket Rath·Kari Repo·Tomi Riipinen·Jussi Ritvas·Pedro Figueroa Romero·Jarkko Ruoho·Jukka Räbinä·Sampo Saarinen·Indrajeet Sagar·Hayk Sargsyan·Matthew Sarsby·Niko Savola·Mykhailo Savytskyi·Ville Selinmaa·Pavel Smirnov·Marco Marín Suárez·Linus Sundström·Sandra Słupińska·Eelis Takala·Ivan Takmakov·Brian Tarasinski·Manish Thapa·Jukka Tiainen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Quantum computing has tremendous potential to overcome some of the fundamental limitations present in classical information processing. Yet, today's technological limitations in the quality and scaling prevent exploiting its full potential. Quantum computing based on superconducting quantum processing units (QPUs) is among the most promising approaches towards practical quantum advantage. In this article the basic technological approach of IQM Quantum Computers is described covering both the QPU and the rest of the full-stack quantum computer. In particular, the focus is on a 20-qubit quantum computer featuring the Garnet QPU and its architecture, which we will scale up to 150 qubits. We also present QPU and system-level benchmarks, including a median 2-qubit gate fidelity of 99.5% and genuinely entangling all 20 qubits in a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state.

Explore related subjects

quant-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Leonid Abdurakhimov, Janos Adam, Hasnain Ahmad, Olli Ahonen, Manuel Algaba, Guillermo Alonso, Ville Bergholm, Rohit Beriwal, Matthias Beuerle, Clinton Bockstiegel, Alessio Calzona, Chun Fai Chan, Daniele Cucurachi, Saga Dahl, Rakhim Davletkaliyev, Olexiy Fedorets, Alejandro Gomez Frieiro, Zheming Gao, Johan Guldmyr, Andrew Guthrie, Juha Hassel, Hermanni Heimonen, Johannes Heinsoo, Tuukka Hiltunen, Keiran Holland, Juho Hotari, Hao Hsu, Antti Huhtala, Eric Hyyppä, Aleksi Hämäläinen, Joni Ikonen, Sinan Inel, David Janzso, Teemu Jaakkola, Mate Jenei, Shan Jolin, Kristinn Juliusson, Jaakko Jussila, Shabeeb Khalid, Seung-Goo Kim, Miikka Koistinen, Roope Kokkoniemi, Anton Komlev, Caspar Ockeloen-Korppi, Otto Koskinen, Janne Kotilahti, Toivo Kuisma, Vladimir Kukushkin, Kari Kumpulainen, Ilari Kuronen, Joonas Kylmälä, Niclas Lamponen, Julia Lamprich, Alessandro Landra, Martin Leib, Tianyi Li, Per Liebermann, Aleksi Lintunen, Wei Liu, Jürgen Luus, Fabian Marxer, Arianne Meijer-van de Griend, Kunal Mitra, Jalil Khatibi Moqadam, Jakub Mrożek, Henrikki Mäkynen, Janne Mäntylä, Tiina Naaranoja, Francesco Nappi, Janne Niemi, Lucas Ortega, Mario Palma, Miha Papič, Matti Partanen, Jari Penttilä, Alexander Plyushch, Wei Qiu, Aniket Rath, Kari Repo, Tomi Riipinen, Jussi Ritvas, Pedro Figueroa Romero, Jarkko Ruoho, Jukka Räbinä, Sampo Saarinen, Indrajeet Sagar, Hayk Sargsyan, Matthew Sarsby, Niko Savola, Mykhailo Savytskyi, Ville Selinmaa, Pavel Smirnov, Marco Marín Suárez, Linus Sundström, Sandra Słupińska, Eelis Takala, Ivan Takmakov, Brian Tarasinski, Manish Thapa, Jukka Tiainen. 2024-08-22. Technology and Performance Benchmarks of IQM's 20-Qubit Quantum Computer. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12433

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Probing the Error-Mitigation Threshold with Matrix Product States

Quantum error mitigation relies on accurate noise characterization, but mismatches between the actual and characterized noise can be amplified and drive a sharp threshold between successful and failed mitigation. In random circuits, this threshold maps onto a random-field Ising transition, but previous exact numerics were limited to small one-dimensional and all-to-all systems, leaving explicit two-dimensional architectures unresolved. We develop a fixed-bond-dimension matrix-product-state method for the replicated transfer dynamics that extends threshold calculations beyond exact propagation while retaining the finite-size signatures of the transition. At system sizes beyond previous exact studies, we recover the predicted absence of a threshold for quenched disorder in 1D, obtain a sharper annealed all-to-all critical point, and resolve architecture-dependent finite-depth thresholds in 2D square and heavy-hex circuits. These results establish replicated tensor-network dynamics as a practical tool for probing error-mitigation thresholds in large and higher-dimensional noisy circuits.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

Low-cost algorithm-to-execution framework for surface-code quantum computing

The execution of useful quantum algorithms on fault-tolerant processors requires more than a mapping from logical gates to encoded operations: the spatial organization, non-Clifford resource supply, and execution schedule must also be determined while keeping physical overhead within practical limits. Although the theoretical hierarchy from logical circuits to fault-tolerant operations is well established, these implementation choices are often specified and optimized separately. Here we develop a low-cost algorithm-to-execution framework for surface-code quantum computing. From hierarchical algorithm descriptions, it constructs dependency-preserving logical schedules and an executable workload capturing logical interactions, operation parallelism, and time-resolved non-Clifford demand, thereby linking logical computation to surface-code organization, resource-state preparation, and fault-tolerant execution in a traceable workflow. We apply the framework to twenty benchmark circuits across seven algorithm families and a hierarchically composed application-scale elliptic-curve discrete-logarithm workload. Physical costs vary substantially even for circuits with similar logical resource counts. Under our direct-rotation calibration, non-Clifford implementation selection reduces space-time volume by up to 241.5 times versus an all-synthesis baseline for the QAOA amplitude-amplification workload. Circuit-specific surface-code layouts reduce routed-latency estimates for all twenty benchmarks; thirteen also reduce space-time volume because communication savings outweigh added spatial overhead. These results show that low-cost fault-tolerant execution depends on computation scheduling and organization, not aggregate logical resource counts alone.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

Sample-optimal learning of stabilizer states

It is well-known that learning a pure $n$-qubit stabilizer state $|\psi\rangle$ both requires, and can be accomplished with, access to a number of copies of $|\psi\rangle$ linear in $n$. However, the precise constant coefficient of this scaling does not appear to have been determined. Here we prove that $L_\delta(n)$, the smallest number of copies from which a quantum procedure can identify any stabilizer state with failure probability at most $0<\delta<1/8$, satisfies $n+\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\rceil-3\leq L_\delta(n)\leq n+\left\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\right\rceil+4$. We present a polynomial-time quantum learning algorithm that saturates this bound, achieving a constant factor improvement in sample-complexity over previously known approaches. As an immediate corollary, we obtain via the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism an algorithm for learning an unknown $n$-qubit Clifford unitary from $2n+\left\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\right\rceil+4$ queries, the $n$-dependence of which we show to be optimal. Our proof technique, which involves Fourier analysis on the abelian group $\mathbb{Z}_4^n \times \mathbb{F}_2^{n(n-1)/2}$, seems to be qualitatively different to previous approaches to stabilizer state learning, and may be of some independent interest; in particular, it admits natural generalisations to further problems in quantum learning theory.

quant-ph↗