Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2408.17283

Non-Promise Version of Unique Sink Orientations

Abstract

A unique sink orientation (USO) is an orientation of the edges of a hypercube such that each face has a unique sink. Many optimization problems like linear programs reduce to USOs, in the sense that each vertex corresponds to a possible solution, and the global sink corresponds to the optimal solution. People have been studying intensively the problem of find the sink of a USO using vertex evaluations, i.e., queries which return the orientation of the edges around a vertex. This problem is a so called promise problem, as it assumes that the orientation it receives is a USO. In this paper, we analyze a non-promise version of the USO problem, in which we try to either find a sink or an efficiently verifiable violation of the USO property. This problem is worth investigating, because some problems which reduce to USO are also promise problems (and so we can also define a non-promise version for them), and it would be interesting to discover where USO lies in the hierarchy of subclasses of $\texttt{TFNP}^\texttt{dt}$, and for this a total search problem is required (which is the case for the non-promise version). We adapt many known properties and algorithms from the promise version to the non-promise one, including known algorithms for small dimensions and lower and upper bounds, like the Fibonacci Seesaw Algorithm. Furthermore, we present an efficient resolution proof of the problem, which shows it is in the search complexity class $\texttt{PLS}^\texttt{dt}$ (although this fact was already known via reductions). Finally, although initially the only allowed violations consist of $2$ vertices, we generalize them to more vertices, and provide a full categorization of violations with $4$ vertices, showing that they are also efficiently verifiable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tiago Oliveira Marques. 2024-08-30. Non-Promise Version of Unique Sink Orientations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.17283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Factorisability of Low Dimensional Non-Negative Integer Matrices

We consider the problem of determining if a given two-dimensional nonnegative integer matrix $M$ is the product of two such matrices, excluding trivial units. A matrix $M$ with no such factorisation is called prime and therefore belongs to the minimal (infinite rank) generator of $2 \times 2$ matrices over the natural numbers, otherwise it is called composite. We also consider the problem of finding a (non-unique) factorisation of a composite matrix. Our results have applications in computational group theory and the theory of codes, where such matrices are called incidence matrices. We analyse the complexity of primality and finding a factorisation for a composite matrix, providing a first efficient algorithm.

cs.DM

The parameterised complexity of generalised temporal domination on temporal graphs with modular structure

Inspired by the static problem $(α,β)$-Dominating Set, we propose a general temporal domination problem, called $(α,β)$-Temporal Dominating Set ($(α,β)$-TDS). We show that this problem encompasses Temporal Dominating Set, and additionally provides first temporal extensions of problems such as $k$-Dominating Set and $α$-Dominating Set. In this paper, we study the parameterised complexity of $(α,β)$-TDS with respect to temporal neighbourhood diversity (TND), temporal modular-width (TMW), and temporal cliquewidth (TCW). We obtain fixed parameter tractability results for all values of $α$ and $β$ with respect to TND; W[1]-hardness with respect to TMW and TCW whenever $β$ is in the problem input, or whenever $α\in (0,1)$ and $β$ is a fixed constant; and para-NP-hardness with respect to TCW when $α= 0$ and $β= 1$, or $α= 1$ and $β= 0$.

cs.DM