Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2409.02946

Winning Lights Out with Fibonacci

Abstract

Lights Out is a single-player electronic handheld game from the 1990s that features a 5 by 5 grid of light-up buttons. The game begins with some lights on and others off. The goal is to turn off all lights but pressing a button changes its state and changes the states of the buttons above and below and to the left and right of the button. We examine a cylindrical Lights Out game in which the left side of the board is connected to the right. Moreover, instead of just on and off we let the lights have $k$ states for $k \ge 2$. We then apply a modified light chasing strategy in which we try to systematically turn off all lights in a row by pressing the buttons in the row below. We ask if the game begins with all lights starting at the same state, how many rows must the board have in order for all lights to be turned off using this type of modified light chasing after we press the last row of lights. We connect this light chasing strategy to the Fibonacci numbers and are able to provide answer to our question by studying the Fibonacci numbers (mod $k$).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Crista Arangala, Stephen Bailey, Kristen Mazur. 2024-08-29. Winning Lights Out with Fibonacci. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02946

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO