Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2409.06580

Exploring Differences between Human Perception and Model Inference in Audio Event Recognition

Yizhou Tan·Yanru Wu·Yuanbo Hou·Xin Xu·Hui Bu·Shengchen Li·Dick Botteldooren·Mark D. Plumbley
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Audio Event Recognition (AER) traditionally focuses on detecting and identifying audio events. Most existing AER models tend to detect all potential events without considering their varying significance across different contexts. This makes the AER results detected by existing models often have a large discrepancy with human auditory perception. Although this is a critical and significant issue, it has not been extensively studied by the Detection and Classification of Sound Scenes and Events (DCASE) community because solving it is time-consuming and labour-intensive. To address this issue, this paper introduces the concept of semantic importance in AER, focusing on exploring the differences between human perception and model inference. This paper constructs a Multi-Annotated Foreground Audio Event Recognition (MAFAR) dataset, which comprises audio recordings labelled by 10 professional annotators. Through labelling frequency and variance, the MAFAR dataset facilitates the quantification of semantic importance and analysis of human perception. By comparing human annotations with the predictions of ensemble pre-trained models, this paper uncovers a significant gap between human perception and model inference in both semantic identification and existence detection of audio events. Experimental results reveal that human perception tends to ignore subtle or trivial events in the event semantic identification, while model inference is easily affected by events with noises. Meanwhile, in event existence detection, models are usually more sensitive than humans.

Explore related subjects

eess.AScs.SD

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yizhou Tan, Yanru Wu, Yuanbo Hou, Xin Xu, Hui Bu, Shengchen Li, Dick Botteldooren, Mark D. Plumbley. 2024-09-10. Exploring Differences between Human Perception and Model Inference in Audio Event Recognition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06580

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Revisiting Lexicon Evaluation in Unsupervised Word Discovery

Building a lexicon from discovered word-like units is a central goal in zero-resource speech processing. But do our evaluations provide a trustworthy indication of lexicon quality? A common metric, normalized edit distance, averages the phoneme edit distances between discovered units in each cluster. We show that this metric has an inherent bias toward the quality of large clusters, inhibiting fair evaluation. Moreover, it ignores how well true classes are distributed across clusters. Based on established theory in clustering literature, we propose two metrics that address these shortcomings: a modified metric that weighs cluster size when assessing within-cluster consistency, and an inverse metric that assesses how true words are spread across clusters. Through experiments on synthetic and real-world lexicons, we demonstrate that combined, these metrics are: (1) more closely correlated with how similar a lexicon is to the ground-truth distribution, and (2) more robust to biases that skew lexicon evaluations.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

AURA: Uncertainty-Routed Activation Editing for Acoustic Grounding in Speech Foundation Models

Attention encoder-decoder (AED) Speech Foundation Models achieve strong ASR performance but can generate acoustically unsupported text when inputs contain no speech, weak acoustic evidence, or unreliable transcription. We propose AURA: Activation-editing with Uncertainty-Routed Adaptation, an ultra-efficient representation-editing method that freezes the pretrained model and applies sparse scale-and-shift edits to decoder cross-attention heads. AURA dynamically routes edits using cross-attention uncertainty features that capture over-concentration, diffuse attention, and abrupt frame shifts. We evaluate AURA on four datasets spanning non-speech hallucination and speech grounding stressors, including imperfect-label child speech, imperfect-label adult speech, and disfluent speech. On non-speech audio, AURA reduces hallucination rate from 89.18% to 1.94% without prior hallucination-head identification. On imperfect-label corpora, AURA approaches LoRA WER while using roughly 500x fewer trainable parameters. Sensitivity analysis and qualitative cross-attention examples are consistent with AURA's uncertainty-routed editing behavior, supporting dynamic activation editing as a practical path for grounding AED speech models.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

The design of an optomechanical microphone using a photonic waveguide interferometer

We present an optomechanical microphone based on a diaphragm-integrated photonic waveguide Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Acoustic pressure deforms the MEMS diaphragm, inducing strain in the sensing waveguide and changing its optical path length. We analytically evaluate the optical and mechanical transduction mechanisms and key figures of merit, including signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range, acoustic overload pressure, and minimum detectable pressure. Two design cases are considered: a MEMS microphone and a measurement microphone. The results indicate competitive performance but no substantial overall advantage over state-of-the-art microphones in conventional applications. The architecture may nevertheless offer advantages for high-temperature and other harsh-environment sensing applications.

eess.AS↗