Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2409.12721

Market Simulation under Adverse Selection

Luca Lalor·Anatoliy Swishchuk
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we study the effects of fill probabilities and adverse fills on the trading strategy simulation process. We specifically focus on a stochastic optimal control market-making problem and test the strategy on ES (E-mini S\&P 500), NQ (E-mini Nasdaq 100), CL (Crude Oil) and ZN (10-Year Treasury Note), which are some of the most liquid futures contracts listed on the CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange). We provide empirical evidence that shows how fill probabilities and adverse fills can significantly affect performance and propose a more prudent simulation framework to deal with this. Many previous works aim to measure different types of adverse selection in the limit order book (LOB), however, they often simulate price processes and market orders independently. This has the ability to largely inflate the performance of a short-term style trading strategy. Our studies show that using more realistic fill probabilities and tracking adverse fills in the strategy simulation process more accurately shows how these types of trading strategies would perform in reality.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.CP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luca Lalor, Anatoliy Swishchuk. 2026-06-02. Market Simulation under Adverse Selection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12721

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

CFOs Meet LLMs

Business sentiment is a closely watched economic signal, but measuring it is slow and costly: surveys typically reach only a few hundred firms, arrive periodically, and take time to compile. We show that large language models hold the potential to address these shortcomings. We prompt an LLM to role-play as the CFO of a specific company on a specific date, for every public-company CFO who responded to the Duke--Federal Reserve CFO Survey between 2002 and 2025, and answer a question about economy-wide optimism. The LLM-generated optimism score predicts the individual CFO's actual answer, even in specifications that include firm and year-quarter fixed effects as well as a control variable measuring the human CFO's lagged response. Accuracy increases with the information provided to the LLM, and the relation persists under quarterly aggregation. We find the same patterns hold for two other questions measuring CFO expectations: the respondent's optimism about their own firm and their expectation of own-firm revenues. With appropriate conditioning, LLMs may in the future be able to serve as digital twins of executives, offering scalable, high-frequency expectations data for financial research and policy.

q-fin.CP↗
arXiv2026

The Physical Crash Frontier: What Finite Option Quotes Can and Cannot Reveal

Physical crash probabilities recovered from option prices depend on a pricing kernel and on a risk-neutral distribution that finitely many bid and ask quotes do not identify. For a power utility investor, we characterize the pairs of physical crash probability and expected loss below the crash threshold that the quotes admit; the boundary of this set is the physical crash frontier. Both coordinates are ratios of moments, yet when the index is bounded above the set is convex, and second-order cone programs compute it exactly at the calibrated risk aversion of two. In a decade of weekly S&P 500 cross sections, the quotes beyond the two puts nearest a 10 percent decline shrink the range of admissible crash probabilities by about 80 percent, yet its upper end remains two to three times its lower end. That lower end exists only because the index is bounded. Otherwise, for any investor more risk averse than the log investor, a vanishing probability far in the right tail inflates the denominator and drives the crash probability to zero while every quote stays inside its spread. A positive floor is therefore a joint statement about prices and a tail restriction; anything tighter than the frontier is an assumption.

q-fin.CP↗
arXiv2026

OrderFusion+: Probabilistic Buy--Sell Price Trajectory Forecasting in Intraday Electricity Markets

Intraday electricity markets enable participants to adjust energy positions close to delivery, with price forecasts necessary to support trading and the scheduling of flexible electricity resources as well as increasingly responsive consumers. Forecasting model specifications have progressed from using macro-features, such as renewable generation and load, to the micro-features of continuous orderbooks. A recent advanced deep learning model, OrderFusion, explicitly models micro-level buy-sell orderbook interactions. However, despite its superior comparative forecasting performance, it considers only one delivery product at a time, ignoring neighboring-product information. Moreover, when forecasting aggregated price indices such as the liquid German ID3, ID2, and ID1 products, it omits the information contained in price trajectories. In contrast, pretrained time-series foundation models have shown success in financial, renewable-energy, and day-ahead electricity price forecasting. However, their performance on intraday orderbook data remains an open research question of considerable practical importance. In this paper, we propose OrderFusion+, an open-source deep learning model that combines historical orders from the target and neighboring delivery products to forecast probabilistic buy-sell price trajectories. We benchmark OrderFusion+ against forecasting baselines and pretrained foundation models, and investigate dynamic market conditions through the designed dynamic masking mechanism, revealing insights into market efficiency. The implementation and forecasts can be found at: https://runyao-yu.com/OrderFusion/

q-fin.CP↗