Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2410.00077

Ribonucleic-Acid Protein Interaction Prediction Based on Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey

Abstract

The interaction between Ribonucleic Acids (RNAs) and proteins, also called RNA Protein Interaction (RPI), governs biological processes, including gene regulation and disease pathogenesis. This comprehensive survey examines Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in Deep Learning-based RPI Prediction (DL-based RPIP) through eight Research Questions (RQs), analyzing 179 studies (2014--2023). The key findings include: sustained technical evolution through embryonic (2014--2017), accelerated (2018--2022), and expansion phases (2023) (RQ1); hybrid models integrating Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) (for topological interface modeling) and Transformers (for long-range dependencies) achieve state-of-the-art performance (RQ4); pretrained language models enhance small-sample learning, but the cross-species generalization declines sharply with evolutionary distance (RQ5). Critical challenges persist, including data heterogeneity across databases, the scarcity of standardized benchmarks (RQ2), and balancing the trade-off between feature encoding and information preservation (RQ3). Future advancements require biologically informed DL architectures, multi-feature fusion, and rigorous cross-validation to bridge the generalization-interpretability gap (RQ8): This would accelerate the clinical translation of predictive tools (RQ6/RQ7). As the first comprehensive analysis spanning feature encoding, modeling, evaluation, applications, and tools, this work fills a critical gap in the DL-based RPIP literature.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Danyu Li, Rubing Huang, Chenhui Cui, Dave Towey, Ling Zhou, Jinyu Tian, Bin Zou. 2026-08-15. Ribonucleic-Acid Protein Interaction Prediction Based on Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00077

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Lightning-fast adaptive immune receptor similarity search by symmetric deletion lookup

An individual's adaptive immune receptor (AIR) repertoire records immune history due to the receptors' antigen specificity. Reading this record requires computational approaches for inferring receptor function from sequence, as the diversity of possible receptor-antigen pairs vastly outstrips experimental knowledge. Identification of AIRs with similar sequence and thus putatively similar function is a common performance bottleneck in these approaches. Here, we benchmark the runtime scaling of five algorithmic approaches to radius-based search for Levenshtein neighbors. We show that a symmetric deletion lookup approach, originally proposed for spell-checking, is particularly scalable. We introduce SymScan and XTNeighbor, optimized CPU and GPU software implementing a parallelized variant of the algorithm. For one million input sequences, these tools identify all sequence pairs that differ by one or two edits in seconds, orders of magnitude faster than existing approaches. We demonstrate how symmetric deletion lookup can be integrated as a pre-filtering step in T cell receptor metaclone discovery and B cell receptor lineage identification. Our contribution is poised to greatly accelerate existing analysis pipelines and enable processing of immunosequencing data at scale.

q-bio.QM

Implication of modelling choices on connectivity estimation: A comparative analysis

Landscape connectivity is an important field with important conservation implications. Connectivity modelling is a useful tool to inform and guide landscape planning. However, it involves assumptions and methodological decisions which ultimately impact connectivity outcomes. In order to understand the implications of modelling choices on final connectivity estimations, we compare two landscape characterisation approaches - expert knowledge and species distribution models - and three movements models - least-cost paths, circuit theory and an individual-based movement simulator. The implementation of the models and the construction of the analyses scope highlighted conceptual and methodological differences that made the comparison difficult. Landscape characterisation appears as the principal factor determining connectivity outcomes. Therefore, the confrontation between expert knowledge and species distribution models is critical to leverage points of convergence and complementarity between these two approaches. Conceptual differences between movement models are reported on connectivity map and habitat patch contribution estimations. In the want of data and protocol design specifically to validate connectivity models, approaches that integrate stochastic and behavioural processes, bring a more realistic perspective to connectivity estimation.

q-bio.QM

Triplication: an important component of the modern scientific method

A scientific-study protocol (defined) is designed to deliver results from which inductive inference is allowed. In the nineteenth century, triplication was introduced into the plant sciences and Fisher's p<0.05 rule (1925) incorporated into triple-result protocols designed to counter random/systematic errors which contribute to real-world variability. The aims of the present study were to: (1) classify replication protocols; (2) assess their prevalence in plant-science studies (published during one twenty-first-century year; for defined variable construct); (3) explore triplication rationale. Methods: a plant-sciences protocol-prevalence report was produced; experimental/associational-study proportions analyzed; and real-world-data proxies used to show confidence-interval-width patterns with increasing replicate number. Results: 25% plant-science studies analyzed showed triplication, including 11% triple-result protocols (including greater replicate numbers: 48%;17%, respectively). Theoretical considerations indicated that even if systematic errors predominate, (previously-known) square-root rules sometimes apply, contributing to triplication importance (exemplified by real-world-data proxies). Conclusions: The defined protocols, with minor modifications, should provide the means for assessment of most sciences. Triplication was extensively applied in studies analysed and there are strong methodological reasons why triplication, rather than duplication/quadruplication, is the appropriate standard: triple-result protocols: (a) effectively reduce false positives to acceptable levels; (b) give qualitatively-different information (shape) from duplication; (c) have a large efficiency advantage (concerning confidence-interval widths) over quadruplication. The application of batch replication is not, primarily, a statistical problem and cannot effectively be replaced by simulation.

q-bio.QM