Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2410.09712

Random effects model-based sufficient dimension reduction for independent clustered data

Abstract

Sufficient dimension reduction (SDR) is a popular class of regression methods which aim to find a small number of linear combinations of covariates that capture all the information of the responses i.e., a central subspace. The majority of current methods for SDR focus on the setting of independent observations, while the few techniques that have been developed for clustered data assume the linear transformation is identical across clusters. In this article, we introduce random effects SDR, where cluster-specific random effect central subspaces are assumed to follow a distribution on the Grassmann manifold, and the random effects distribution is characterized by a covariance matrix that captures the heterogeneity between clusters in the SDR process itself. We incorporate random effect SDR within a model-based inverse regression framework. Specifically, we propose a random effects principal fitted components model, where a two-stage algorithm is used to estimate the overall fixed effect central subspace, and predict the cluster-specific random effect central subspaces. We demonstrate the consistency of the proposed estimators, while simulation studies demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed approach compared to global and cluster-specific SDR approaches. We also present extensions of the above model to handle mixed predictors, demonstrating how random effects SDR can be achieved in the case of mixed continuous and binary covariates. Applying the proposed methods to study the longitudinal association between the life expectancy of women and socioeconomic variables across 117 countries, we find log income per capita, infant mortality, and income inequality are the main drivers of a two-dimensional fixed effect central subspace, although there is considerable heterogeneity in how the country-specific central subspaces are driven by the predictors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Linh H. Nghiem, F. K. C. Hui. 2024-10-13. Random effects model-based sufficient dimension reduction for independent clustered data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09712

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Considerations for the Integration of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Data

As clinical decision-making increasingly moves toward individualized and context-specific treatment recommendations, reliance on any single evidence source, randomized or observational, may be insufficient. Principled integration of randomized controlled trials and real-world data, grounded in explicit causal frameworks, offers a path toward evidence that is both internally credible and externally relevant. In this article, we describe distinct objectives for the integration of randomized controlled trials and real-world data and discuss how these objectives shape key design and analytic considerations, illustrating the resulting choices through example estimands. We highlight practical issues that commonly arise in applied settings, including data relevance and curation, cross-source comparability, estimand specification, and sensitivity analysis. We aim for this article to help readers evaluate and implement principled approaches to integrating randomized controlled trials and real-world data in ways that can support more reliable treatment recommendations while maintaining regulatory-grade evidentiary standards.

stat.ME

Validity of MMRM-based hypothesis testing under missing-not-at-random mechanisms

In randomized clinical trials with longitudinal continuous outcomes, missing-not-at-random (MNAR) missingness often motivates conservative alternatives to mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM). Such caution is important for estimation, but estimation and testing need not require identical assumptions. Moreover, overly conservative primary analyses may reduce power, increase required sample size, and raise trial costs. We investigated the validity of MMRM-based testing under the global null of identical longitudinal outcome distributions across groups. Because valid testing minimally requires treatment-effect estimators to converge to the null under the null hypothesis, we investigated sufficient conditions for this property. We introduced a proportional observation condition requiring ratios of observation probabilities relative to a reference group, conditional on the full outcome vector, to be outcome-independent, and showed that, with arbitrary post-baseline visits and monotone missingness, this condition is sufficient for convergence to the null value. The condition allows observation to depend on unobserved outcomes and permits between-group differences in overall observation probabilities through outcome-independent dropout, making it clinically interpretable while accommodating outcome-dependent MNAR missingness. Synthetic and data-based bootstrap simulations showed negligible bias and empirical test sizes near 0.05, including nonmonotone missingness. Thus, MNAR missingness does not by itself imply that a more conservative primary testing procedure is required. This result does not justify treatment-effect estimation under alternatives, which still requires estimand-based interpretation and sensitivity analyses.

stat.ME

Optimized variance estimation under interference and complex experimental designs

Unbiased and consistent variance estimators generally do not exist for design-based treatment effect estimators because experimenters never observe more than one potential outcome for any unit. The problem is exacerbated by interference and complex experimental designs. Experimenters must accept conservative variance estimators in these settings, but they can strive to minimize the conservativeness. In this paper, we show that the task of constructing a minimally conservative variance estimator can be interpreted as an optimization problem that aims to find the lowest estimable upper bound of the true variance given the experimenter's risk preferences and knowledge of the potential outcomes. We characterize the set of admissible bounds in the class of quadratic forms, and we demonstrate that the optimization problem is a convex program for many natural objectives. The resulting variance estimators are guaranteed to be conservative regardless of whether the background knowledge used to construct the bound is correct, but the estimators are less conservative if the provided information is reasonably accurate. Numerical results show that the resulting variance estimators can be considerably less conservative than existing estimators, allowing experimenters to draw more informative inferences about treatment effects.

stat.ME