Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2410.09778

LEAD Dataset: How Can Labels for Sound Event Detection Vary Depending on Annotators?

Naoki Koga·Yoshiaki Bando·Keisuke Imoto
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a LargE-scale Annotator's labels for sound event Detection (LEAD) dataset, which is the dataset used to gain a better understanding of the variation in strong labels in sound event detection (SED). In SED, it is very time-consuming to collect large-scale strong labels, and in most cases, multiple workers divide up the annotations to create a single dataset. In general, strong labels created by multiple annotators have large variations in the type of sound events and temporal onset/offset. Through the annotations of multiple workers, uniquely determining the strong label is quite difficult because the dataset contains sounds that can be mistaken for similar classes and sounds whose temporal onset/offset is difficult to distinguish. If the strong labels of SED vary greatly depending on the annotator, the SED model trained on a dataset created by multiple annotators will be biased. Moreover, if annotators differ between training and evaluation data, there is a risk that the model cannot be evaluated correctly. To investigate the variation in strong labels, we release the LEAD dataset, which provides distinct strong labels for each clip annotated by 20 different annotators. The LEAD dataset allows us to investigate how strong labels vary from annotator to annotator and consider SED models that are robust to the variation of strong labels. The LEAD dataset consists of strong labels assigned to sound clips from TUT Sound Events 2016/2017, TUT Acoustic Scenes 2016, and URBAN-SED. We also analyze variations in the strong labels in the LEAD dataset and provide insights into the variations.

Explore related subjects

cs.SDeess.AS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Naoki Koga, Yoshiaki Bando, Keisuke Imoto. 2024-10-13. LEAD Dataset: How Can Labels for Sound Event Detection Vary Depending on Annotators?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09778

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Streaming Generation for Music Accompaniment

Music generation models can produce high-fidelity coherent accompaniment given complete audio input, but are limited to editing and loop-based workflows. We study real-time audio-to-audio accompaniment: as a model hears an input audio stream (e.g., a singer singing), it has to also simultaneously generate in real-time a coherent accompanying stream (e.g., a guitar accompaniment). In this work, we propose a model design considering inevitable system delays in practical deployment with two design variables: future visibility $t_f$, the offset between the output playback time and the latest input time used for conditioning, and output chunk duration $k$, the number of frames emitted per call. We train Transformer decoders across a grid of $(t_f,k)$ and show two consistent trade-offs: increasing effective $t_f$ improves coherence by reducing the recency gap, but requires faster inference to stay within the latency budget; increasing $k$ improves throughput but results in degraded accompaniment due to a reduced update rate. Finally, we observe that naive maximum-likelihood streaming training is insufficient for coherent accompaniment where future context is not available, motivating advanced anticipatory and agentic objectives for live jamming.

cs.SD↗
arXiv2026

M-CIF: Multi-Scale Alignment For CIF-Based Non-Autoregressive ASR

The Continuous Integrate-and-Fire (CIF) mechanism provides effective alignment for non-autoregressive (NAR) speech recognition. This mechanism creates a smooth and monotonic mapping from acoustic features to target tokens, achieving performance on Mandarin competitive with other NAR approaches. However, without finer-grained guidance, its stability degrades in some languages such as English and French. In this paper, we propose Multi-scale CIF (M-CIF), which performs multi-level alignment by integrating character and phoneme level supervision progressively distilled into subword representations, thereby enhancing robust acoustic-text alignment. Experiments show that M-CIF reduces WER compared to the Paraformer baseline, especially on CommonVoice by 4.21% in German and 3.05% in French. To further investigate these gains, we define phonetic confusion errors (PE) and space-related segmentation errors (SE) as evaluation metrics. Analysis of these metrics across different M-CIF settings reveals that the phoneme and character layers are essential for enhancing progressive CIF alignment.

cs.SD↗
arXiv2026

Decoding Order Matters in Autoregressive Speech Synthesis

Autoregressive speech synthesis often adopts a left-to-right order, yet generation order is a modelling choice. We investigate decoding order through masked diffusion framework, which progressively unmasks positions and allows arbitrary decoding orders during training and inference. By interpolating between identity and random permutations, we show that randomness in decoding order affects speech quality. We further compare fixed strategies, such as \texttt{l2r} and \texttt{r2l} with adaptive ones, such as Top-$K$, finding that fixed-order decoding, including the dominating left-to-right approach, is suboptimal, while adaptive decoding yields better performance. Finally, since masked diffusion requires discrete inputs, we quantise acoustic representations and find that even 1-bit quantisation can support reasonably high-quality speech.

cs.SD↗