Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2410.11775

Random expansions of trees with bounded height

Abstract

We consider a sequence $\mathbf{T} = (\mathcal{T}_n : n \in \mathbb{N}^+)$ of trees $\mathcal{T}_n$ where, for some $Δ\in \mathbb{N}^+$ every $\mathcal{T}_n$ has height at most $Δ$ and as $n \to \infty$ the minimal number of children of a nonleaf tends to infinity. We can view every tree as a (first-order) $τ$-structure where $τ$ is a signature with one binary relation symbol. For a fixed (arbitrary) finite and relational signature $σ\supseteq τ$ we consider the set $\mathbf{W}_n$ of expansions of $\mathcal{T}_n$ to $σ$ and a probability distribution $\mathbb{P}_n$ on $\mathbf{W}_n$ which is determined by a (parametrized/lifted) Probabilistic Graphical Model (PGM) $\mathbb{G}$ which can use the information given by $\mathcal{T}_n$. The kind of PGM that we consider uses formulas of a many-valued logic that we call $PLA^*$ with truth values in the unit interval $[0, 1]$. We also use $PLA^*$ to express queries, or events, on $\mathbf{W}_n$. With this setup we prove that, under some assumptions on $\mathbf{T}$, $\mathbb{G}$, and a (possibly quite complex) formula $φ(x_1, \ldots, x_k)$ of $PLA^*$, as $n \to \infty$, if $a_1, \ldots, a_k$ are vertices of the tree $\mathcal{T}_n$ then the value of $φ(a_1, \ldots, a_k)$ will, with high probability, be almost the same as the value of $ψ(a_1, \ldots, a_k)$, where $ψ(x_1, \ldots, x_k)$ is a ``simple'' formula the value of which can always be computed quickly (without reference to $n$), and $ψ$ itself can be found by using only the information that defines $\mathbf{T}$, $\mathbb{G}$ and $φ$. A corollary of this, subject to the same conditions, is a probabilistic convergence law for $PLA^*$-formulas.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vera Koponen, Yasmin Tousinejad. 2025-03-29. Random expansions of trees with bounded height. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2025.115201

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO