Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2410.21019

Beyond Trade Openness: Network-Based Evidence on African Economic Integration

Abstract

This paper develops a network-based methodology for measuring economic integration in Africa. Conventional indicators such as trade openness and intra-regional trade shares capture the volume of trade but not countries' structural roles within the continental trade system. Using bilateral intra-African trade data for 2000-2019, we construct annual directed trade networks and measure countries' direct connectivity, recursive influence, brokerage role, and core embeddedness using weighted degree, PageRank, betweenness and random-walk betweenness, clustering, and k-core network indicators. We further benchmark observed network positions against a maximum-entropy null model to identify countries whose centrality exceeds that expected from their trade intensity alone. The results show a gradual densification of intra-African trade and the persistence of a core-periphery structure led by a small group of highly connected economies. Dynamic panel estimates indicate that economic development, infrastructure, institutional quality, human capital, regional trade agreements, and FDI are associated with stronger structural integration, whereas trade costs and overlapping regional memberships weaken several dimensions of network position. The findings suggest that African integration depends not only on expanding trade volumes but also on improving countries' positions within continental trade.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tekilu Tadesse Choramo, Jemal Abafita, Yerali Gandica, Luis E C Rocha. 2026-07-10. Beyond Trade Openness: Network-Based Evidence on African Economic Integration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21019

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computing Endogenous Transformations in Processing Networks: A Dynamic Calibration Approach

Understanding how supply chains endogenously transform requires a parametric model of processing networks with non-neutral substitution elasticities. While the Cascaded CES production function provides a rigorous framework, dynamically calibrating its structural parameters from time-series data constitutes a highly non-convex inverse optimization problem. Since enforcing strict microeconomic concavity renders standard monolithic approaches computationally intractable, we propose a novel structure-exploiting algorithm to bypass this limitation. By leveraging the physical upstreamness topology of the network, our hybrid heuristic effectively breaks the curse of dimensionality inherent in economywide processing networks. Applying this framework to U.S. time-series data, we provide a scalable computational engine to fully endogenize complex supply-chain transformations, ultimately uncovering the elastic origins of asymmetric macroeconomic tail risks.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Screening Out the Needy: The Effects of SNAP Work Requirements

We examine the effectiveness of work requirements as a screening device in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Work requirements for "able-bodied adults without dependents" were suspended after the Great Recession and gradually reinstated across counties and states in the 2010s. Using linked administrative SNAP and employment data from five states and a triple-differences design, we find that work requirements reduce SNAP participation by seven percent without increasing labor supply and disproportionately screen out low-income individuals. We develop a welfare framework to interpret these results and find that the social costs of work requirements exceed budget savings.

econ.GN