Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2410.21469

Hybrid Bayesian Smoothing on Surfaces

Abstract

Modeling spatial processes that exhibit both smooth and rough features poses a significant challenge. This is especially true in fields where complex physical variables are observed across spatial domains. Traditional spatial techniques, such as Gaussian processes (GPs), are ill-suited to capture sharp transitions and discontinuities in spatial fields. In this paper, we propose a new approach incorporating non-Gaussian processes (NGPs) into a hybrid model which identifies both smooth and rough components. Specifically, we model the rough process using scaled mixtures of Gaussian distributions in a Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM). Our motivation comes from the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble (CESM-LE), where we seek to emulate climate sensitivity fields that exhibit complex spatial patterns, including abrupt transitions at ocean-land boundaries. We demonstrate that traditional GP models fail to capture such abrupt changes and that our proposed hybrid model, implemented through a full Gibbs sampler. This significantly improves model interpretability and accurate recovery of process parameters. Through a multi-factor simulation study, we evaluate the performance of several scaled mixtures designed to model the rough process. The results highlight the advantages of using these heavier tailed priors as a replacement to the Bayesian fused LASSO. One prior in particular, the normal Jeffrey's prior stands above the rest. We apply our model to the CESM-LE dataset, demonstrating its ability to better represent the mean function and its uncertainty in climate sensitivity fields. This work combines the strengths of GPs for smooth processes with the flexibility of NGPs for abrupt changes. We provide a computationally efficient Gibbs sampler and include additional strategies for accelerating Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) sampling.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matthew Hofkes, Douglas Nychka. 2024-10-28. Hybrid Bayesian Smoothing on Surfaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21469

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME