Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2410.23723

Intersecting families with full difference sets

Abstract

For a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of a finite set, define $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{F})=\{F\setminus F': F, F'\in\mathcal{F}\}$. A family $\mathcal{F}$ is called intersecting if $F\cap F'\not=\emptyset$ for all $F, F'\in\mathcal{F}$. Frankl \cite{Frankl} showed that for a $k$-uniform intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subset{[n]\choose k}$ with $n\ge k(k+3)$, $|\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{F})|$ reaches the maximum if and only if $\mathcal{F}$ is a $k$-uniform full star. Later, Frankl-Kiselev-Kupavskii \cite{FKK} improved the bound $n\ge k(k+3)$ in the above result of Frankl \cite{Frankl} to $n\ge 50klnk$ for $k\ge 50$. For $2k<n<4k$, Frankl-Kiselev-Kupavskii \cite{FKK} showed that there exists a $k$-uniform family $\mathcal{F}\subset{[n]\choose k}$ such that $|\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{F})|$ is larger than $|\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{S})|$, where $\mathcal{S}$ is a full star. This result left the case $n=2k$ open and we show that $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{F})$ can be `full' for some $\mathcal{F}\subset{[n]\choose k}$. It is clear that for an intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subset{[n]\choose k}$, $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{F})\subseteq \cup_{j=0}^{k-1}{[n]\choose j}$. We say that a $k$-uniform intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subset{[n]\choose k}$ has full differences if $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{F})=\cup_{j=0}^{k-1}{[n]\choose j}$. For odd $k$, Frankl \cite{Frankl} gave a $k$-uniform intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subset{[2k]\choose k}$ having full differences of size $k-1$, and he asked for even $k\ge 4$ whether there exists a $k$-uniform intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subset{[2k]\choose k}$ having full differences of size $k-1$. We answer this question in a stronger form and show that for even $k\ge 4$, there exists a $k$-uniform intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subset{[2k]\choose k}$ having full differences.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yan zilong, Peng Yuejian. 2024-11-29. Intersecting families with full difference sets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23723

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO