Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2411.07908

Asymptotically sharp bounds for cancellative and union-free hypergraphs

Abstract

An $r$-graph is called $t$-cancellative if for arbitrary $t+2$ distinct edges $A_1,\ldots,A_t,B,C$, it holds that $(\cup_{i=1}^t A_i)\cup B\neq (\cup_{i=1}^t A_i)\cup C$; it is called $t$-union-free if for arbitrary two distinct subsets $\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B}$, each consisting of at most $t$ edges, it holds that $\cup_{A\in\mathcal{A}} A\neq \cup_{B\in\mathcal{B}} B$. Let $C_t(n,r)$ and $U_t(n,r)$ denote the maximum number of edges that can be contained in an $n$-vertex $t$-cancellative and $t$-union-free $r$-graph, respectively. The study of $C_t(n,r)$ and $U_t(n,r)$ has a long history, dating back to the classic works of Erdős and Katona, and Erdős and Moser in the 1970s. In 2020, Shangguan and Tamo showed that $C_{2(t-1)}(n,tk)=Θ(n^k)$ and $U_{t+1}(n,tk)=Θ(n^k)$ for all $t\ge 2$ and $k\ge 2$. In this paper, we determine the asymptotics of these two functions up to a lower order term, by showing that for all $t\ge 2$ and $k\ge 2$, \begin{align*} \text{$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{C_{2(t-1)}(n,tk)}{n^k}=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{U_{t+1}(n,tk)}{n^k}=\frac{1}{k!}\cdot \frac{1}{\binom{tk-1}{k-1}}$.} \end{align*} Previously, it was only known by a result of Füredi in 2012 that $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{C_{2}(n,4)}{n^2}=\frac{1}{6}$. To prove the lower bounds of the limits, we utilize a powerful framework developed recently by Delcourt and Postle, and independently by Glock, Joos, Kim, Kühn, and Lichev, which shows the existence of near-optimal hypergraph packings avoiding certain small configurations, and to prove the upper bounds, we apply a novel counting argument that connects $C_{2(t-1)}(n,tk)$ to a classic result of Kleitman and Frankl on a special case of the famous Erdős Matching Conjecture.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Miao Liu, Chong Shangguan, Chenyang Zhang. 2024-11-12. Asymptotically sharp bounds for cancellative and union-free hypergraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07908

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO