Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2411.08456

The Sylvester question in $\mathbb{R}^d$: convex sets with a flat floor

Abstract

Pick $n$ independent and uniform random points $U_1,\ldots,U_n$ in a compact convex set $K$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$ with volume 1, and let $P^{(d)}_K(n)$ be the probability that these points are in convex position. The Sylvester conjecture in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is that $\min_K P^{(d)}_K(d+2)$ is achieved by the $d$-dimensional simplices $K$ (only). In this paper, we focus on a companion model, already studied in the $2d$ case, which we define in any dimension $d$: we say that $K$ has $F$ as a flat floor, if $F$ is a subset of $K$, contained in a hyperplan $P$, such that $K$ lies in one of the half-spaces defined by $P$. We define $Q_K^F(n)$ as the probability that $U_1,\cdots,U_n$ together with $F$ are in convex position (i.e., the $U_i$ are on the boundary of the convex hull ${\sf CH}(\{U_1,\cdots,U_n\}\cup F\})$). We prove that, for all fixed $F$, $K\mapsto Q_K^F(2)$ reaches its minimum on the "mountains" with floor $F$ (mountains are convex hull of $F$ union an additional vertex), while the maximum is not reached, but $K\mapsto Q_K^F(2)$ has values arbitrary close to 1. If the optimisation is done on the set of $K$ contained in $F\times[0,d]$ (the "subprism case"), then the minimum is also reached by the mountains, and the maximum by the "prism" $F\times[0,1]$. Since again, $Q_K^F{(2)}$ relies on the expected volume (of ${\sf CH}(\{V_1,V_2\}\cup F\})$), this result can be seen as a proof of the Sylvester problem in the floor case. In $2d$, where $F$ can essentially be the segment $[0,1],$ we give a general decomposition formula for $Q_K^F(n)$ so to compute several formulas and bounds for different $K$. In 3D, we give some bounds for $Q_K^F(n)$ for various floors $F$ and special cases of $K$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jean-François Marckert, Ludovic Morin. 2026-08-31. The Sylvester question in $\mathbb{R}^d$: convex sets with a flat floor. https://doi.org/10.1214/yy-tn

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO