Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2411.12923

Towards Automated Verification of Logarithmic Arithmetic

Abstract

Correctness proofs for floating point programs are difficult to verify. To simplify the task, a similar, but less complex system, known as logarithmic arithmetic can be used. The Boyer-Moore Theorem Prover, NQTHM, mechanically verified the correctness of a simple implementation of logarithmic arithmetic. It also verified some useful theorems about accumulated relative error bounds for addition, multiplication and division in this logarithmic number system. These theorems were used to verify a program that approximates e^x using a truncated Taylor series. Axioms that characterize the finite precision of the logarithmic system using a rational base, b, were shown by the prover to be satisfiable for any choice of 1 < b < 2. The prover verified the correctness of a function for converting an arbitrary rational value to a logarithmic representation. It also verified that multiplication and division implementations produce exact results for exact inputs, and that addition implementation produces a result as accurate as possible for exact inputs. When these operations are used in combination by a program, such as evaluating a polynomial, the relative error increases in a way that can be bounded by simple expressions, referred to here as tolerances. Several mechanically verified theorems about tolerances allow us to construct mechanically verified proofs about logarithmic arithmetic programs. Although similar to interval arithmetic, tolerances are especially suited to logarithmic arithmetic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark G. Arnold, Thomas A. Bailey, John R. Cowles. 2024-11-19. Towards Automated Verification of Logarithmic Arithmetic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12923

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO