Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2411.19649

Dynamic ETF Portfolio Optimization Using enhanced Transformer-Based Models for Covariance and Semi-Covariance Prediction(Work in Progress)

Abstract

This study explores the use of Transformer-based models to predict both covariance and semi-covariance matrices for ETF portfolio optimization. Traditional portfolio optimization techniques often rely on static covariance estimates or impose strict model assumptions, which may fail to capture the dynamic and non-linear nature of market fluctuations. Our approach leverages the power of Transformer models to generate adaptive, real-time predictions of asset covariances, with a focus on the semi-covariance matrix to account for downside risk. The semi-covariance matrix emphasizes negative correlations between assets, offering a more nuanced approach to risk management compared to traditional methods that treat all volatility equally. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate that Transformer-based predictions of both covariance and semi-covariance significantly enhance portfolio performance. Our results show that portfolios optimized using the semi-covariance matrix outperform those optimized with the standard covariance matrix, particularly in volatile market conditions. Moreover, the use of the Sortino ratio, a risk-adjusted performance metric that focuses on downside risk, further validates the effectiveness of our approach in managing risk while maximizing returns. These findings have important implications for asset managers and investors, offering a dynamic, data-driven framework for portfolio construction that adapts more effectively to shifting market conditions. By integrating Transformer-based models with the semi-covariance matrix for improved risk management, this research contributes to the growing field of machine learning in finance and provides valuable insights for optimizing ETF portfolios.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiahao Zhu, Hengzhi Wu. 2024-11-29. Dynamic ETF Portfolio Optimization Using enhanced Transformer-Based Models for Covariance and Semi-Covariance Prediction(Work in Progress). https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19649

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM