Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2412.03024

Broadcast Graph Is NP-complete

Abstract

The broadcast model is widely used to describe the process of information dissemination from a single node to all nodes within an interconnected network. In this model, a graph represents the network, where vertices correspond to nodes and edges to communication links. The efficiency of this broadcasting process is evaluated by the broadcast time, the minimum discrete time units required to broadcast from a given vertex. Determining the broadcast time is referred to as the problem Broadcast Time. The set of vertices with the minimum broadcast time among the graph is called the broadcast center. Identifying this center or determining its size are both proven to be NP-hard. For a graph with n vertices, the minimum broadcast time is at least ceil(log2 n). The Broadcast Graph problem asks in a graph of n vertices, whether the broadcast time from any vertex equals ceil(log2 n). Extensive research over the past 50 years has focused on constructing broadcast graphs, which are optimal network topologies for one-to-all communication efficiency. However, the computational complexity of the Broadcast Graph problem has rarely been the subject of study. We believe that the difficulty lies in the mapping reduction for an NP-completeness proof. Consequently, we must construct broadcast graphs for yes-instances and non-broadcast graphs for no-instances. The most closely related result is the NP-completeness of Broadcast Time proved by Slater et al. in 1981. More recently, Fomin et al. has proved that Broadcast Time is fixed-parameter tractable. In this paper, we prove that Broadcast Graph is NP-complete by proving a reduction from Broadcast Time. We also improve the results on the complexity of the broadcast center problem. We show Broadcast Center Size is in delta^2_p, and is DP-hard, implying a complexity upper bound of delta^2_p-complete and a lower bound of DP-hard.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jinghan Xu, Zhiyuan Li. 2024-12-04. Broadcast Graph Is NP-complete. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Factorisability of Low Dimensional Non-Negative Integer Matrices

We consider the problem of determining if a given two-dimensional nonnegative integer matrix $M$ is the product of two such matrices, excluding trivial units. A matrix $M$ with no such factorisation is called prime and therefore belongs to the minimal (infinite rank) generator of $2 \times 2$ matrices over the natural numbers, otherwise it is called composite. We also consider the problem of finding a (non-unique) factorisation of a composite matrix. Our results have applications in computational group theory and the theory of codes, where such matrices are called incidence matrices. We analyse the complexity of primality and finding a factorisation for a composite matrix, providing a first efficient algorithm.

cs.DM

The parameterised complexity of generalised temporal domination on temporal graphs with modular structure

Inspired by the static problem $(α,β)$-Dominating Set, we propose a general temporal domination problem, called $(α,β)$-Temporal Dominating Set ($(α,β)$-TDS). We show that this problem encompasses Temporal Dominating Set, and additionally provides first temporal extensions of problems such as $k$-Dominating Set and $α$-Dominating Set. In this paper, we study the parameterised complexity of $(α,β)$-TDS with respect to temporal neighbourhood diversity (TND), temporal modular-width (TMW), and temporal cliquewidth (TCW). We obtain fixed parameter tractability results for all values of $α$ and $β$ with respect to TND; W[1]-hardness with respect to TMW and TCW whenever $β$ is in the problem input, or whenever $α\in (0,1)$ and $β$ is a fixed constant; and para-NP-hardness with respect to TCW when $α= 0$ and $β= 1$, or $α= 1$ and $β= 0$.

cs.DM