Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2412.19024

Nonparametric Estimation of Matching Efficiency and Elasticity in a Spot Gig Work Platform: 2019-2023

Abstract

This paper provides new evidence on spot gig work platforms for individuals seeking flexible, short-term jobs with minimal educational or experience requirements in Japan. Using proprietary data from Timee, a private matching platform, the study analyzes trends in active users, vacancies, hires, and labor market tightness, compared to part-time data from Hello Work, a public employment service. Applying a nonparametric approach, it finds that the private platform exhibits substantially higher matching efficiency, especially after 2022. Elasticities also differ across platforms: for Hello Work, the user elasticity fluctuates around 0.3--0.5, while the vacancy elasticity ranges roughly from 0.4 to slightly above 1.0; for the private platform, the user elasticity remains around 0.2--0.3, while the vacancy elasticity ranges from 0.7 to 1.1. At the prefecture level, the three prefectures exhibit broadly similar movements early in the sample, followed by divergence and partial re-convergence later on, while elasticities remain stable and similar across regions. These results reveal how digital platforms reshape job matching dynamics relative to traditional systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hayato Kanayama, Suguru Otani. 2026-06-22. Nonparametric Estimation of Matching Efficiency and Elasticity in a Spot Gig Work Platform: 2019-2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Local Media and the Shaping of Social Norms: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak

Media's influence on norms and behavior is widely recognized. Less is known about the role played by media being local. I examine this in a high-stakes context, the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. I exploit quasi-random variation in access to radio and the timing of a public-health campaign aired on community radio. I find that 12-17% of Ebola cases could have been prevented if places with access to a neighboring community radio station had instead had their own. Impacts are driven by radio being local rather than by ethno-linguistic belonging. Local media facilitates coordination in behaviors observed and sanctioned locally.

econ.GN

Productivity Shocks and Input Misallocation: A Decomposition

This paper asks how much input misallocation productivity uncertainty generates and at which stage of input decisions it arises. I separate revenue productivity by when each component is revealed and trace each into the gap between an input's marginal revenue product and its price. In six European countries, shocks revealed after an input is committed account for 20 percent of capital gap dispersion and 5 percent of labor gap dispersion. An unanticipated one percent rise in productivity raises the capital gap by 0.92 percent and the labor gap by 0.19 percent, because most of the shock passes into the wage.

econ.GN

When Do Type-Specific Wages Buffer Distributional Incidence in TANK?

When do relative wages buffer the unequal incidence of aggregate shocks? I derive a consumption-gap decomposition and a present-value condition for partial offset in a TANK model. An extension separates wage-setting demand elasticity from substitution between labor segments and allows each segment to contain both financial types. With a zero inherited wage gap and a same-sign discounted wedge, substitution above one gives offsetting earnings reallocation; substitution below one gives amplification. The channel disappears when financial types have identical segment exposure. Numerical experiments assess these mechanisms, shock persistence, policy feedback, and aggregate-IRF matching. In the nested perfect-alignment monetary benchmark, the peak consumption gap is about two-fifths smaller under type-specific wages than under the common-wage closure. These are conditional model comparisons, not empirical effect estimates or welfare rankings.

econ.GN