Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.02288

Making the Peers' Subjective Well-being Visible Impairs Cooperator-centered Experimental Social Networks

Akihiro Nishi·Hiroyasu Ando·Meaghan Woody·Kamal Nayan Reddy Challa
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Past experiments show that reputation or the knowledge of peers' past cooperation can enhance cooperation in human social networks. On the other hand, the knowledge of peers' wealth undermines cooperativeness, and that of peers' interconnectedness and network structure does not affect it. However, it is unknown if making peers' subjective well-being (SWB) available or visible in social networks may enhance or undermine cooperation. Therefore, we implemented online network experiments (N = 662 in 50 networked groups with 15 rounds of interactions), in which study participants cooperated with or defected against connected peers through Public Goods Game, made and cut social ties with others, and rated their SWB. We manipulated the visibility of connected peers' SWB (25 visible vs. 25 invisible SWB networked groups) while keeping the connected peers' reputation and in-game wealth visible. Results show that making the peers/ SWB visible did not alter overall cooperativeness, wealth, inter-connectedness, or SWB. In contrast, the visible SWB networked groups exhibited a higher number of communities and lower transitivity (the proportion of the cases where a peer of a peer is also a peer) than the invisible SWB networked groups. These phenomena are explained by an altered decision-making pattern in the visible SWB networks: cooperators were less likely to connect with cooperators and more likely to connect with defectors, and consequently, cooperators could not maintain their popularity or stay in the center of the networks.

Explore related subjects

cs.SIphysics.soc-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Akihiro Nishi, Hiroyasu Ando, Meaghan Woody, Kamal Nayan Reddy Challa. 2025-01-04. Making the Peers' Subjective Well-being Visible Impairs Cooperator-centered Experimental Social Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02288

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Benefit of Collective Intelligence in Community-Based Content Moderation is Limited by Overt Political Signalling

Social media platforms face increasing scrutiny over the rapid spread of misinformation. In response, many have adopted community-based content moderation systems, including Community Notes (formerly Birdwatch) on X (formerly Twitter), Community Notes on Meta, and Footnotes on TikTok. However, research shows that the current design of these systems can allow political biases to influence both the development of notes and the rating processes, reducing their overall effectiveness. We hypothesise that enabling users to collaborate on writing notes, rather than relying solely on individually authored notes, can enhance the overall quality of their notes. To test this idea, we conducted an online experiment in which participants jointly authored notes on politically misleading posts. We find that collaboration improves the helpfulness of notes, although the average effect depends on the interactional context. In particular, the benefits of collaboration decline when participants are made aware of one another's political affiliations. We also find that politically diverse teams improve note quality when evaluating Republican posts, while team composition does not meaningfully affect note quality for Democrat posts. These findings underscore the complexity of community-based content moderation and highlight the importance of understanding group dynamics and political diversity when designing more effective moderation systems.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

The Same Ledger, Different Verdicts: How Measurement Specification Determines On-Chain Concentration

Whether a public blockchain is "decentralized" is routinely settled by citing a concentration statistic. On two ERC-20 ledgers, Chainlink (LINK) and Uniswap (UNI) over a 90-day window, we show that verdict depends on measurement specification rather than the ledger itself. Four discretionary choices (holder population, address type, temporal aggregation, and entity resolution) move the balance HHI for UNI from 109 to 2,336 (a factor of 21), with every specification defensible. Over the same range, the Gini coefficient moves by less than 0.003 and does not change under entity resolution, demonstrating that Gini and HHI answer different questions and cannot substitute for one another. We further document an implementation choice - summing versus overwriting repeated transfers - that discards roughly 85% of volume and overturns a finding on wealth and structural position. Substantively, both ledgers are extraordinarily unequal in ownership (balance Gini = 0.990 and 0.998) yet unconcentrated in routing (weekly flow HHI = 421 and 386), with the two dimensions close to statistically independent across addresses. A parameterized criterion for hidden brokers identifies 30 and 18 zero-balance intermediaries, 12 shared across ledgers; a matched control confirms that degree thresholding, rather than learned embeddings, drives the discovery. Finally, on the governance ledger, proposal-eligible addresses and routing intermediaries are almost disjoint, so routing contestability is held at the pleasure of a rule layer with a Nakamoto coefficient of two. We conclude that on-chain concentration should be reported as a specified range rather than a point estimate.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Optimal and heuristic strategies for evaluating the influence of coordinated behavior in information cascades and retweet networks

Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior (CIB) has become a major concern in online social platforms, yet its actual impact on information diffusion remains poorly understood. Existing research has primarily focused on detecting coordinated activity, while comparatively little attention has been devoted to quantifying its influence once detected. In this work, we introduce two complementary frameworks for the post-hoc evaluation of coordinated accounts. First, we formulate the problem on information cascades as a constrained influence maximization problem over directed trees and develop a polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm that computes the optimal placement of coordinated nodes, providing an upper bound on their achievable influence. Second, motivated by the limited availability of diffusion cascades in real-world platforms, we propose a network-based framework that estimates influence directly from retweet networks using the independent cascade model and compares the observed placement of coordinated accounts against established heuristic baselines. We evaluate both approaches on Twitter/X data from the 2019 UK General Election and on a collection of verified state-backed information operation campaigns spanning multiple countries. While coordinated accounts exhibit limited influence in the UK cascades, the network-based analysis reveals substantial differences across campaigns, with several operations achieving influence comparable to or exceeding that of structurally central seed sets. Finally, by reconstructing cascades from the retweet networks, we show that the two frameworks produce consistent results, suggesting that the observed effects reflect intrinsic structural properties of coordinated activity rather than artifacts of the underlying methodology.

cs.SI↗