Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2501.02653

New Pseudorandom Generators and Correlation Bounds Using Extractors

Abstract

We establish new correlation bounds and pseudorandom generators for a collection of computation models. These models are all natural generalizations of structured low-degree $F_2$-polynomials that we did not have correlation bounds for before. In particular: 1. We construct a PRG for width-2 $poly(n)$-length branching programs which read $d$ bits at a time with seed length $2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}\cdot d^2\log^2(1/ε)$. This comes quadratically close to optimal dependence in $d$ and $\log(1/ε)$. The previous PRG by Bogdanov, Dvir, Verbin, and Yehudayoff had an exponentially worse dependence on $d$ with seed length of $O(d\log n + d2^d\log(1/ε))$. 2. We provide correlation bounds and PRGs against size-$n^{Ω(\log n)}$ AC0 circuits with either $n^{.99}$ SYM gates (computing an arbitrary symmetric function) or $n^{.49}$ THR gates (computing an arbitrary linear threshold function). Previous work of Servedio and Tan only handled $n^{.49}$ SYM gates or $n^{.24}$ THR gates, and previous work of Lovett and Srinivasan only handled polysize circuits. 3. We give exponentially small correlation bounds against degree-$n^{O(1)}$ $F_2$-polynomials set-multilinear over some partition of the input into $n^{.99}$ parts (noting that at $n$ parts, we recover all low-degree polynomials). This generalizes correlation bounds against degree-$(d-1)$ polynomials which are set-multilinear over a fixed partition into $d$ blocks, which were established by Bhrushundi, Harsha, Hatami, Kopparty and Kumar. The common technique behind all of these results is to fortify a hard function with the right type of extractor to obtain stronger correlation bounds. Although this technique has been used in previous work, it relies on the model shrinking to a very small class under random restrictions. Our results show such fortification can be done even for classes that do not enjoy such behavior.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vinayak M. Kumar. 2025-01-05. New Pseudorandom Generators and Correlation Bounds Using Extractors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02653

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC