Word-representability of co-bipartite graph

Biswajit Das; Ramesh Hariharasubramanian

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.10112

Word-representability of co-bipartite graph

Biswajit Das·Ramesh Hariharasubramanian

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A graph $G = (V, E)$ is word-representable, if there exists a word $w$ over the alphabet $V$ such that for letters $\{x,y\}\in V$, $x$ and $y$ alternate in $w$ if and only if $xy \in E$. A graph is co-bipartite if its complement is a bipartite graph. Therefore, the vertex set of a co-bipartite graph can be partitioned into two disjoint cliques. The concept of word-representability for co-bipartite graphs has not yet been fully studied. In the book Words and Graphs written by Sergey Kitaev and Vadim Lozin, examples of co-bipartite graphs that are not word-representable are provided. The authors have stated that it remains an open problem to characterize word-representable co-bipartite graphs. It is known that taking the complement of word-representable graphs does not preserve their word-representability. In this paper, we first identify certain classes of bipartite graphs for which word-representation is preserved after the complement operation. We found that the complement of the path graphs, even cycle graphs and generalized crown graphs are also word-representable. Next, we aim to find word-representable co-bipartite graphs in which the size of one clique partition is fixed while the other one can vary. We studied the word-representability of co-bipartite graphs where the sizes of one clique partition are $2$ and $3$. We found that any co-bipartite graphs where the size of the one clique partition is $2$ are word-representable. Also, when the size of the one clique partition is $3$, we found certain co-bipartite graphs are word-representable. Additionally, for word-representable graphs, it has been established that a graph is word-representable if and only if it can be oriented in a specific manner, known as semi-transitive orientation. We provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for a co-bipartite graph to have a semi-transitive orientation.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Biswajit Das, Ramesh Hariharasubramanian. 2025-01-17. Word-representability of co-bipartite graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10112

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO↗