Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.12272

A Lightweight Approach for User and Keyword Classification in Controversial Topics

Ahmad Zareie·Kalina Bontcheva·Carolina Scarton
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Classifying the stance of individuals on controversial topics and uncovering their concerns is crucial for social scientists and policymakers. Data from Online Social Networks (OSNs), which serve as a proxy to a representative sample of society, offers an opportunity to classify these stances, discover society's concerns regarding controversial topics, and track the evolution of these concerns over time. Consequently, stance classification in OSNs has garnered significant attention from researchers. However, most existing methods for this task often rely on labelled data and utilise the text of users' posts or the interactions between users, necessitating large volumes of data, considerable processing time, and access to information that is not readily available (e.g. users' followers/followees). This paper proposes a lightweight approach for the stance classification of users and keywords in OSNs, aiming at understanding the collective opinion of individuals and their concerns. Our approach employs a tailored random walk model, requiring just one keyword representing each stance, using solely the keywords in social media posts. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of our method compared to the baselines, excelling in stance classification of users and keywords, with a running time that, while not the fastest, remains competitive.

Explore related subjects

cs.SI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ahmad Zareie, Kalina Bontcheva, Carolina Scarton. 2025-01-21. A Lightweight Approach for User and Keyword Classification in Controversial Topics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12272

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why Does Misinformation Propagate Faster? An Algorithmic Perspective on X

Misinformation is widely reported to propagate faster on engagement-based platforms, yet prior work largely focused on empirical analysis, without identifying a specific algorithmic mechanism that results in this phenomenon. Thanks to the open-sourcing of X's recommendation algorithms, we conduct what is, to our knowledge, the first component-level study of the recommendation algorithm deployed by a social media platform, which examines how each of its components affects misinformation propagation. Specifically, we identify the engagement fungibility mechanism in the algorithm, where the final recommendation score is constructed as a weighted sum of all predicted user activities. As a result, a tweet can be repeatedly recommended simply because it is predicted to draw many instant reactions (e.g., likes and retweets), even when it is not expected to draw thoughtful responses (e.g., replies and quotes). Since misinformation typically draws a larger share of its engagement from instant reactions, this mechanism enables it to receive more recommendation exposure and to propagate faster. To empirically validate this mechanism, we re-implement X's recommendation algorithm on the USC X 2024 election corpus, and build a calibrated simulation study to analyze the impact of different scoring rules. We find that re-tuning the metric weights has little or even a negative impact on reducing the credibility exposure gap, while those scoring rules that set a precondition of thoughtful engagement for amplification would be able to alleviate the gap significantly, across 46 robustness checks. Our diagnosis, therefore, yields a simple and deployable fix, a reflective-threshold gate that withholds amplification until a tweet is predicted to draw thoughtful engagement, which we find to reallocate exposure away from low-credibility content at no cost to mainstream exposure and with no loss of engagement.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

The Conversation Turns First: Crowd Discussion and Price Reversals in Prediction Markets

Prediction markets combine trading with public discussion of the same events. We examine whether comment-derived signals predict subsequent activity, buying direction, and changes in the leading outcome. A correlation sweep across 79 non-political Polymarket markets guides six classification experiments comparing comment features, trading features, and their combinations. On live blocks containing comments, attention nearly matches trading history in predicting heavy trading within 18 hours (PR-AUC 0.786 versus 0.790, against prevalence 0.606), with its relative advantage concentrated in short markets. Comment content carries directional information: toxicity ranks future buying direction above chance in 43 of 53 scored markets, while adding attention, sentiment, and stance to flow history increases ROC-AUC from 0.780 to 0.788. Leadership changes are predicted primarily by market state. Stance shifts against the leader before reversals in 23 of 27 evaluable markets, but adds no clear improvement in individual-block forecasting. These results distinguish attention from directional support and price uncertainty. They establish predictive associations consistent with discussion and trading responding to shared information, without identifying a causal effect of comments on markets.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Deep-learning-aided dismantling of interdependent networks

Identifying the minimal set of nodes whose removal breaks a complex network apart, also referred as the network dismantling problem, is a highly non-trivial task with applications in multiple domains. Whereas network dismantling has been extensively studied over the past decade, research has primarily focused on the formulations of the optimization problem for single-layer networks, neglecting that many, if not all, real networks display multiple layers of interdependent interactions. In such networks, the optimization problem is fundamentally different as the effect of removing nodes propagates within and across layers in a way that can not be predicted using a single-layer perspective. Here, we propose a dismantling algorithm named MultiDismantler, which leverages multiplex network representation and deep reinforcement learning to optimally dismantle multi-layer interdependent networks. MultiDismantler is trained on small synthetic multiplex graphs; when applied to large, real and synthetic networks, it displays exceptional dismantling performance, clearly outperforming all existing methods that rely on a single-layer approach to network dismantling. We show that MultiDismantler is effective in guiding strategies for the containment of diseases in social networks characterized by multiple layers of social interactions. Also, we show that MultiDismantler is useful in the design of protocols aimed at delaying the onset of cascading failures in interdependent critical infrastructures.

cs.SI↗