Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2501.14461

Efficient parameterized approximation

Abstract

Many problems are NP-hard and, unless P = NP, do not admit polynomial-time exact algorithms. The fastest known exact algorithms exactly usually take time exponential in the input size. Much research effort has gone into obtaining faster exact algorithms for instances that are sufficiently well-structured, e.g., through parameterized algorithms with running time $f(k)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ where n is the input size and k quantifies some structural property such as treewidth. When k is small, this is comparable to a polynomial-time exact algorithm and outperforms the fastest exact exponential-time algorithms for a large range of k. In this work, we are interested instead in leveraging instance structure for polynomial-time approximation algorithms. We aim for polynomial-time algorithms that produce a solution of value at most or at least (depending on minimization vs. maximization) $c\mathrm{OPT}\pm f(k)$ where c is a constant. Unlike for standard parameterized algorithms, we do not assume that structural information is provided with the input. Ideally, we can obtain algorithms with small additive error, i.e., $c=1$ and $f(k)$ is polynomial or even linear in $k$. For small k, this is similarly comparable to a polynomial-time exact algorithm and will beat general case approximation for a large range of k. We study Vertex Cover, Connected Vertex Cover, Chromatic Number, and Triangle Packing. The parameters we consider are the size of minimum modulators to graph classes on which the respective problem is tractable. For most problem-parameter combinations we give algorithms that compute a solution of size at least or at most $\mathrm{OPT}\pm k$. In the case of Vertex Cover, most of our algorithms are tight under the Unique Games Conjecture and provide better approximation guarantees than standard 2-approximations if the modulator is smaller than the optimum solution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stefan Kratsch, Pascal Kunz. 2025-01-24. Efficient parameterized approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14461

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS