Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2501.18106

Logistic regression models: practical induced prior specification

Abstract

Bayesian inference for statistical models with a hierarchical structure is often characterized by specification of priors for parameters at different levels of the hierarchy. When higher level parameters are functions of the lower level parameters, specifying a prior on the lower level parameters leads to induced priors on the higher level parameters. However, what are deemed uninformative priors for lower level parameters can induce strikingly non-vague priors for higher level parameters. Depending on the sample size and specific model parameterization, these priors can then have unintended effects on the posterior distribution of the higher level parameters. Here we focus on Bayesian inference for the Bernoulli distribution parameter $θ$ which is modeled as a function of covariates via a logistic regression, where the coefficients are the lower level parameters for which priors are specified. A specific area of interest and application is the modeling of survival probabilities in capture-recapture data and occupancy and detection probabilities in presence-absence data. In particular we propose alternative priors for the coefficients that yield specific induced priors for $θ$. We address three induced prior cases. The simplest is when the induced prior for $θ$ is Uniform(0,1). The second case is when the induced prior for $θ$ is an arbitrary Beta($α$, $β$) distribution. The third case is one where the intercept in the logistic model is to be treated distinct from the partial slope coefficients; e.g., $E[θ]$ equals a specified value on (0,1) when all covariates equal 0. Simulation studies were carried out to evaluate performance of these priors and the methods were applied to a real presence/absence data set and occupancy modelling.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ken B. Newman, Cristiano Villa, Ruth King. 2025-02-02. Logistic regression models: practical induced prior specification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18106

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME