Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2502.00176

Settling the no-$(k+1)$-in-line problem when $k$ is not small

Abstract

What is the maximum number of points that can be selected from an $n \times n$ square lattice such that no $k+1$ of them are in a line? This has been asked more than $100$ years ago for $k=2$ and it remained wide open ever since. In this paper, we prove the precise answer is $kn$, provided that $k>C\sqrt{n\log{n}}$ for an absolute constant $C$. The proof relies on carefully constructed bi-uniform random bipartite graphs and concentration inequalities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Benedek Kovács, Zoltán Lóránt Nagy, Dávid R. Szabó. 2025-01-31. Settling the no-$(k+1)$-in-line problem when $k$ is not small. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00176

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Rooted Spider Embeddings and the Erd\H os-Sós Conjecture

Under a local density condition, we prove that every $k$-edge spider embeds at any prescribed center of degree at least $k$, unless all legs are even and the host graph has one of two specified structures. These structures contain complete bipartite subgraphs with prescribed neighborhoods. The proof uses path rerouting and three exchange lemmas that describe equality in neighborhood estimates. As a consequence, we recover the Erd\H os-Sós bound for all spiders.

math.CO

Generalized Goulden-Yong duals and signed minimal factorizations

In this paper, we give two combinatorial ways to study signed exceptional sequences. First, we show the equivalence between one-way reflections and relatively projective representations. Secondly, we construct generalized Goulden-Yong duals using reverse Garside element actions and folded chord diagrams. We then give two applications of the generalized Goulden-Yong duals: constructing generalized Prüfer codes and counting signed factorizations using the matrix-tree theorem.

math.CO

Explicit expressions for iterates of power series

We present several formulas for both the discrete and fractional iterates of an invertible power series $f$, using a new unifying approach based on umbral calculus. Known formulas are extended, and their proofs simplified, while new expressions are introduced. In particular, by employing $q$-calculus identities, we eliminate the requirement for $f'(0)$ to equal $1$ and the resulting general expressions for the iterative logarithm are obtained as well.

math.CO